一道很老很老的题目了,今天再次做发现og10和11上的解释有本质的不同 107. Downzoning, zoning that typically results in the reduction of housing density, allows for more open space in areas where little water or services exist. (A) little water or services exist (B) little water or services exists (C) few services and little water exists (D) there is little water or services available (E) there are few services and little available water 答案选E og10的解释:The adjective little modifies "mass nouns" (e.g., water), which refer to some undifferentiated quantity; the adjective few modifies "count nouns" (e.g., services), which refer to groups made up of distinct members that can be considered individually. Hence, choices A, B, and D are incorrect because little cannot properly modify services. Also, since water and services are being discussed as a pair, they should logically be treated as a compound subject requiring a plural verb; thus, the singular verbs exists (in B and C) and is (in D) are wrong. Choice E is best: the plural verb are is used, and few correctly modifies services. 而og11中对B、D的解释是 B. Singular verb exists does not agree with the plural subject services;when a compound subject is joined by or , the verb agrees with the closer subject. D. Little cannot modify services.
我的问题:由og10解释中的红体字部分可知排除B、C、D的一个原因是water 和services看做一个compound subject时(这里应该是同时包括了由and和or连接的情况了),谓语要用复数形式
我的问题:由og10解释中的红体字部分可知排除B、C、D的一个原因是water 和services看做一个compound subject时(这里应该是同时包括了由and和or连接的情况了),谓语要用复数形式 而og11清楚地表示A or B作主语时,谓语要遵循就近原则,即这里谓语要是复数的原因是要和services一致
而og11清楚地表示A or B作主语时,谓语要遵循就近原则,即这里谓语要是复数的原因是要和services一致 这就出现了两种截然不同的解释了 NN们解释一下吧
这就出现了两种截然不同的解释了 NN们解释一下吧 还有一点就是there be是否存在就近原则呢? D选项中or换成and的话,继续用there is是否正确?
还有一点就是there be是否存在就近原则呢? D选项中or换成and的话,继续用there is是否正确? The adjective little modifies "mass nouns" (e.g., water), which refer to some undifferentiated quantity; the adjective few modifies "count nouns" (e.g., services), which refer to groups made up of distinct members that can be considered individually. Hence, choices A, B, and D are incorrect because little cannot properly modify services. Also, since water and services are being discussed as a pair, they should logically be treated as a compound subject requiring a plural verb; thus, the singular verbs exists (in B and C) and is (in D) are wrong. Choice E is best: the plural verb are is used, and few correctly modifies services. 而og11中对B、D的解释是 B. Singular verb exists does not agree with the plural subject services;when a compound subject is joined by or , the verb agrees with the closer subject. D. Little cannot modify services.
我的问题:由og10解释中的红体字部分可知排除B、C、D的一个原因是water 和services看做一个compound subject时(这里应该是同时包括了由and和or连接的情况了),谓语要用复数形式
我的问题:由og10解释中的红体字部分可知排除B、C、D的一个原因是water 和services看做一个compound subject时(这里应该是同时包括了由and和or连接的情况了),谓语要用复数形式 而og11清楚地表示A or B作主语时,谓语要遵循就近原则,即这里谓语要是复数的原因是要和services一致
而og11清楚地表示A or B作主语时,谓语要遵循就近原则,即这里谓语要是复数的原因是要和services一致 这就出现了两种截然不同的解释了 NN们解释一下吧
这就出现了两种截然不同的解释了 NN们解释一下吧 还有一点就是there be是否存在就近原则呢? D选项中or换成and的话,继续用there is是否正确?
还有一点就是there be是否存在就近原则呢? D选项中or换成and的话,继续用there is是否正确?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-7 0:40:34编辑过] |