ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: LUCIE_SIMON
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-Q12

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-1-3 19:35:02 | 只看该作者
The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States
, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?  问题问的就是 关于美国妇女教育历史,k的work 和 W的主要有什么不同?
K的观点:Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s that after the American Revolution (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican motherhood” resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. K认为是美国革命后,“共和母亲“导致妇女受教育机会增加。

W的观点:Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody’s evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, W认为妇女教育机会的增加是在美国革命前就发生的,同时CHALLENGE了 REVOLUTION 改变了对妇女受教育的态度。

也就是K认为妇女教育机会增加,人们对妇女受教育的态度的改变是 美国革命 造成的,AFTER THE 1775-1783; 但是W认为是革命前。AROUND 1750.

D > Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century.

无论是K的AFTER 1775,  还是W的AROUND 1750, 他们都认为 态度改变是在18世纪发生的。不过是18世纪中期还是18世纪后期。所以D不对。

B>      The extent (of the support for educational opportunities for girls) prior to the American Revolution 说在美国革命之前 支持女孩受教育的程度(不同)。K认为是美国革命后才得到了更多的支持,也就是说 K认为在革命之前的支持程度 (the extent) 小, 然而w认为 在革命前就已经改变了,即他认为的支持extent肯定高于k认为的。所以答案是B.
12#
发表于 2010-5-6 22:54:26 | 只看该作者
希望NN来给个结论啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
13#
发表于 2010-6-2 00:32:37 | 只看该作者
支持10楼的,说的很清楚了。。
14#
发表于 2010-9-30 10:42:53 | 只看该作者
The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States
, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?  问题问的就是 关于美国妇女教育历史,k的work 和 W的主要有什么不同?
K的观点:Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s that after the American Revolution (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican motherhood” resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. K认为是美国革命后,“共和母亲“导致妇女受教育机会增加。

W的观点:Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody’s evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, W认为妇女教育机会的增加是在美国革命前就发生的,同时CHALLENGE了 REVOLUTION 改变了对妇女受教育的态度。

也就是K认为妇女教育机会增加,人们对妇女受教育的态度的改变是 美国革命 造成的,AFTER THE 1775-1783; 但是W认为是革命前。AROUND 1750.

D > Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century.

无论是K的AFTER 1775,  还是W的AROUND 1750, 他们都认为 态度改变是在18世纪发生的。不过是18世纪中期还是18世纪后期。所以D不对。

B>      The extent (of the support for educational opportunities for girls) prior to the American Revolution 说在美国革命之前 支持女孩受教育的程度(不同)。K认为是美国革命后才得到了更多的支持,也就是说 K认为在革命之前的支持程度 (the extent) 小, 然而w认为 在革命前就已经改变了,即他认为的支持extent肯定高于k认为的。所以答案是B.
-- by 会员 waytodream (2010/1/3 19:35:02)

good explanation!
15#
发表于 2010-10-5 10:46:16 | 只看该作者
支持10楼~
16#
发表于 2010-10-22 22:06:58 | 只看该作者
请教下NN

我选的是C
当时做的时候,因为觉得B的PRIOR TO要转弯下才能符合K的论点
所以排除了B
C是不是错在PUBLIC RESISTANCE上?
不应该是RESISTANCE 而顶多是ATTITUDES?

盼解答~~~!!!
17#
发表于 2011-8-10 10:52:42 | 只看该作者
The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States
, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?  问题问的就是 关于美国妇女教育历史,k的work 和 W的主要有什么不同?
K的观点:Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s that after the American Revolution (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican motherhood” resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. K认为是美国革命后,“共和母亲“导致妇女受教育机会增加。

W的观点:Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody’s evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, W认为妇女教育机会的增加是在美国革命前就发生的,同时CHALLENGE了 REVOLUTION 改变了对妇女受教育的态度。

也就是K认为妇女教育机会增加,人们对妇女受教育的态度的改变是 美国革命 造成的,AFTER THE 1775-1783; 但是W认为是革命前。AROUND 1750.

D > Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century.

无论是K的AFTER 1775,  还是W的AROUND 1750, 他们都认为 态度改变是在18世纪发生的。不过是18世纪中期还是18世纪后期。所以D不对。

B>      The extent (of the support for educational opportunities for girls) prior to the American Revolution 说在美国革命之前 支持女孩受教育的程度(不同)。K认为是美国革命后才得到了更多的支持,也就是说 K认为在革命之前的支持程度 (the extent) 小, 然而w认为 在革命前就已经改变了,即他认为的支持extent肯定高于k认为的。所以答案是B.
-- by 会员 waytodream (2010/1/3 19:35:02)



极度同意这位大侠的观点!!!
18#
发表于 2011-8-10 10:55:24 | 只看该作者
请教下NN

我选的是C
当时做的时候,因为觉得B的PRIOR TO要转弯下才能符合K的论点
所以排除了B
C是不是错在PUBLIC RESISTANCE上?
不应该是RESISTANCE 而顶多是ATTITUDES?

盼解答~~~!!!
-- by 会员 Antonia1213 (2010/10/22 22:06:58)


文章没有讲到 公众的抵制吧?irrelevant选项哦
19#
发表于 2011-9-17 14:54:47 | 只看该作者
not mentioned
20#
发表于 2011-9-24 16:17:29 | 只看该作者
E.Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

请问E呢?

TW并没有提到“ contribute to the success of a republican form of government”而LK有。

求解呀呀呀~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-20 03:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部