The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States , Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following? 问题问的就是 关于美国妇女教育历史,k的work 和 W的主要有什么不同? K的观点:Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s that after the American Revolution (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican motherhood” resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. K认为是美国革命后,“共和母亲“导致妇女受教育机会增加。 W的观点:Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750.    ointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody’s evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, W认为妇女教育机会的增加是在美国革命前就发生的,同时CHALLENGE了 REVOLUTION 改变了对妇女受教育的态度。 也就是K认为妇女教育机会增加,人们对妇女受教育的态度的改变是 美国革命 造成的, AFTER THE 1775-1783; 但是W认为是革命前。AROUND 1750. D > Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century. 无论是K的AFTER 1775, 还是W的AROUND 1750, 他们都认为 态度改变是在18世纪发生的。不过是18世纪中期还是18世纪后期。 所以D不对。 B> The extent (of the support for educational opportunities for girls) prior to the American Revolution 说在美国革命之前 支持女孩受教育的程度(不同)。K认为是美国革命后才得到了更多的支持,也就是说 K认为在革命之前的支持程度 (the extent) 小, 然而w认为 在革命前就已经改变了,即他认为的支持extent肯定高于k认为的。所以答案是B. -- by 会员 waytodream (2010/1/3 19:35:02)
good explanation! |