ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1521|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

14号下午考试归来

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-15 15:21:00 | 只看该作者

14号下午考试归来

真的是不好意思,因为昨天下午考试完一直在忙别的,没有及时提供机经

向所有四月考的CDer说声不好意思!

作文:

1。某市因为工业污染严重,来这里旅游的旅客减少了很多,政府的收入相应地减少。而最近在该市一些公园发现有矿产资源,所以作者提议让一些企业能在这些公园里开采矿,这样这些企业就能赚钱并愿意支付税,这样政府就能增加税收收入

2。是黄金80题里面的

“As technologies and the demand for certain services change, many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker, not to government or to business.”

 

数学:

1.    一个数0.xyz,问这个数是否大于2/3

(1)x+y>14

(2)x+z>15

2.还是那道三男三女围者圆桌做,B确定做某一个具体位置。但多了个条件是男的不连着坐。

 数学只能计这么多,不好意思啊~

 

阅读:1.之前大家提到的地球水资源的由来

2.    关于动物之前的观察学习行为

第一段先说动物存在这种观察行为,并有科学的说法解释这种行为究竟是一种怎样的行为

第二段说这种行为可以让动物通过观察同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物

第三段是科学家通过对hen的观察,发现其实动物很难通过观察学习同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物,有一些原因:如没有足够的交流等。但是该实验发现hen回因为同类喜欢某些食物而跟着选择这些食物

问题有:第一段的作用,第三段那些科学家同意的观点

后面两篇因为怕时间不够,没有很认真看

 

逻辑:

沙发
发表于 2009-4-15 15:54:00 | 只看该作者
收到了谢谢
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-15 17:29:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑是:

1政府准备跟新火车,旧火车最快速度为80,而新的火车的最快速度是120,反对者说火车轨道只能承受80的平均速度,问weaken反对者的选项

2某地区政府准备提高没买一包烟的税,把这些税收用来支持教育。政府的目的就是为了减少吸烟的人和提高教育资金,为哪个选项是政府的目的不可以达到

我选的是卖烟的人会转成卖相对便宜的香烟

地板
发表于 2009-4-15 17:37:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享
5#
发表于 2009-4-15 17:57:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢lz分享,那篇阅读好像是gwd,反正在哪里见过

6#
发表于 2009-4-15 19:46:00 | 只看该作者

GWD28-Q3
to Q6:
      Social learning in animals is said to
occur when direct or indirect social interaction facilitates the acquisition of
a novel behavior.  It usually takes the
form of an experienced animal (the demonstrator) performing a behavior such
that the naïve animal (the observer) subsequently expresses the same behavior
sooner, or more completely, than it would have otherwise.  One example of social learning is the
acquisition of preferences for novel foods.


 

      Some experiments have suggested that
among mammals, social learning facilitates the identification of beneficial
food items, but that among birds, social learning helps animals avoid toxic
substances. For example, one study showed that when red-wing blackbirds
observed others consuming a colored food or a food in a distinctly marked
container and then becoming ill, they subsequently avoided food associated with
that color or container.  Another experiment
showed that house sparrows consumed less red food after they observed others
eating red food that was treated so as to be noxious.  Studies on nonavian species have not produced
similar results, leading researchers to speculate that avian social learning
may be fundamentally different from that of mammals.


 

      But Sherwin’s recent experiments with
domestic hens do not support the notion that avian social learning necessarily
facilitates aversion to novel foods that are noxious or toxic.  Even when demonstrator hens reacted with obvious
disgust to a specific food, via vigorous head shaking and bill wiping, there
was no evidence that observers subsequently avoided eating that food. Sherwin’s
research team speculated that ecological or social constraints during the
evolution of this species might have resulted in there being little benefit
from the social learning of unpalatability, for instance, selective pressures
for this mode of learning would be reduced if the birds rarely encountered
noxious or toxic food or rarely interacted after eating such food, or if the
consequences of ingestion were minimal. In a related experiment, the same
researchers showed that if observer hens watched demonstrator hens react
favorably to food of a particular color, then observer hens ate more food of
that color than they ate of food of other colors. These results confirmed that avian
species can develop preferences for palatable food through social learning.


 

 


 

 

 

Q3:


 

The
primary purpose of the passage is to discuss the


 

A.   
techniques used in certain experiments on
social learning in birds


 

B.   
reasons for the differences between social
learning in birds and in mammals


 

C.   
question of how social learning manifests
itself in birds


 

D.   
basis for a widespread belief about a
difference in behavior between birds and mammals


 

E.    
possible reasons why birds may or may not
learn from each other in a particular way


 

-------------------------------------------------------------------


 

Q4:


 

According
to the passage, which of the following is true of the experiments on domestic
hens conducted by Sherwin’s research team?


 

             


 

A.   
Only a small number of observer hens
appeared to learn to avoid food that was demonstrated by other hens to be
noxious.


 

B.   
Observer hens ingested food preferentially
only after numerous instances of witnessing demonstrator hens preferentially
ingest that type of food.


 

C.   
Observer hens appeared unable to recognize
when demonstrator hens found a particular food especially palatable.


 

D.   
Demonstrator hens reacted adversely to
ingesting certain novel foods.


 

E.    
Demonstrator hens altered their behavior
less obviously in response to noxious foods than in response to highly
palatable foods.


 

--------------------------------------------------------------------


 

Q5:


 

It can be
inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree with
which of the following statements regarding the results of the recent
experiments conducted by Sherwin’s research team?


 

A.   
The experiments demonstrate that social
learning in avian species facilitates the identification of noxious or toxic
foods.


 

B.   
The experiments suggest that social learning
has made avian species less adept than nonavian species at learning to prefer
beneficial foods and avoid noxious and toxic foods.


 

C.   
The experiments undermine the notion that
most avian species have evolved in environments where there is little benefit
to the social learning of unpalatability.


 

  

 

 

D.   
The experiments suggest that the acquisition
of food preferences in avian species is largely unaffected by social learning.


 

E.    
The experiments show that social learning in
avian species can promote the preferential consumption of beneficial foods but
do not support the claim that social learning in avian species promotes the
avoidance of noxious or toxic foods.



动物学习行为的阅读是这篇吧?今天刚做的……



[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-15 19:51:29编辑过]
7#
发表于 2009-4-16 08:41:00 | 只看该作者
mm客气哦, 提供jj就是好样的
8#
发表于 2009-4-16 09:00:00 | 只看该作者

请JJ作者确认哈

2.    关于动物之前的观察学习行为

第一段先说动物存在这种观察行为,并有科学的说法解释这种行为究竟是一种怎样的行为

第二段说这种行为可以让动物通过观察同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物

第三段是科学家通过对hen的观察,发现其实动物很难通过观察学习同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物,有一些原因:如没有足够的交流等。但是该实验发现hen回因为同类喜欢某些食物而跟着选择这些食物

问题有:第一段的作用,第三段那些科学家同意的观点

后面两篇因为怕时间不够,没有很认真看   是这篇JJ么???

 

 

GWD-TN-19


GWD28-Q3 to Q6:

      Social learning in animals is said to occur when direct or indirect social interaction facilitates the acquisition of a novel behavior.  It usually takes the form of an experienced animal (the demonstrator) performing a behavior such that the naïve animal (the observer) subsequently expresses the same behavior sooner, or more completely, than it would have otherwise.  One example of social learning is the acquisition of preferences for novel foods.

      Some experiments have suggested that among mammals, social learning facilitates the identification of beneficial food items, but that among birds, social learning helps animals avoid toxic substances. For example, one study showed that when red-wing blackbirds observed others consuming a colored food or a food in a distinctly marked container and then becoming ill, they subsequently avoided food associated with that color or container.  Another experiment showed that house sparrows consumed less red food after they observed others eating red food that was treated so as to be noxious.  Studies on nonavian species have not produced similar results, leading researchers to speculate that avian social learning may be fundamentally different from that of mammals.

      But Sherwin’s recent experiments with domestic hens do not support the notion that avian social learning necessarily facilitates aversion to novel foods that are noxious or toxic.  Even when demonstrator hens reacted with obvious disgust to a specific food, via vigorous head shaking and bill wiping, there was no evidence that observers subsequently avoided eating that food. Sherwin’s research team speculated that ecological or social constraints during the evolution of this species might have resulted in there being little benefit from the social learning of unpalatability, for instance, selective pressures for this mode of learning would be reduced if the birds rarely encountered noxious or toxic food or rarely interacted after eating such food, or if the consequences of ingestion were minimal. In a related experiment, the same researchers showed that if observer hens watched demonstrator hens react favorably to food of a particular color, then observer hens ate more food of that color than they ate of food of other colors. These results confirmed that avian species can develop preferences for palatable food through social learning.

 


Q3:

The primary purpose of the passage is to discuss the

A.      techniques used in certain experiments on social learning in birds

B.      reasons for the differences between social learning in birds and in mammals

C.      question of how social learning manifests itself in birds

D.      basis for a widespread belief about a difference in behavior between birds and mammals

E.       possible reasons why birds may or may not learn from each other in a particular way

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:

According to the passage, which of the following is true of the experiments on domestic hens conducted by Sherwin’s research team?

             

A.      Only a small number of observer hens appeared to learn to avoid food that was demonstrated by other hens to be noxious.

B.      Observer hens ingested food preferentially only after numerous instances of witnessing demonstrator hens preferentially ingest that type of food.

C.      Observer hens appeared unable to recognize when demonstrator hens found a particular food especially palatable.

D.      Demonstrator hens reacted adversely to ingesting certain novel foods.

E.       Demonstrator hens altered their behavior less obviously in response to noxious foods than in response to highly palatable foods.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding the results of the recent experiments conducted by Sherwin’s research team?

A.      The experiments demonstrate that social learning in avian species facilitates the identification of noxious or toxic foods.

B.      The experiments suggest that social learning has made avian species less adept than nonavian species at learning to prefer beneficial foods and avoid noxious and toxic foods.



C.      The experiments undermine the notion that most avian species have evolved in environments where there is little benefit to the social learning of unpalatability.

D.      The experiments suggest that the acquisition of food preferences in avian species is largely unaffected by social learning.

E.       The experiments show that social learning in avian species can promote the preferential consumption of beneficial foods but do not support the claim that social learning in avian species promotes the avoidance of noxious or toxic foods.

-----------------

9#
发表于 2009-4-16 09:00:00 | 只看该作者

请JJ作者确认哈

2.    关于动物之前的观察学习行为

第一段先说动物存在这种观察行为,并有科学的说法解释这种行为究竟是一种怎样的行为

第二段说这种行为可以让动物通过观察同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物

第三段是科学家通过对hen的观察,发现其实动物很难通过观察学习同类的行为来避免吃到有毒的食物,有一些原因:如没有足够的交流等。但是该实验发现hen回因为同类喜欢某些食物而跟着选择这些食物

问题有:第一段的作用,第三段那些科学家同意的观点

后面两篇因为怕时间不够,没有很认真看   是这篇JJ么???

 

 

GWD-TN-19


GWD28-Q3 to Q6:

      Social learning in animals is said to occur when direct or indirect social interaction facilitates the acquisition of a novel behavior.  It usually takes the form of an experienced animal (the demonstrator) performing a behavior such that the naïve animal (the observer) subsequently expresses the same behavior sooner, or more completely, than it would have otherwise.  One example of social learning is the acquisition of preferences for novel foods.

      Some experiments have suggested that among mammals, social learning facilitates the identification of beneficial food items, but that among birds, social learning helps animals avoid toxic substances. For example, one study showed that when red-wing blackbirds observed others consuming a colored food or a food in a distinctly marked container and then becoming ill, they subsequently avoided food associated with that color or container.  Another experiment showed that house sparrows consumed less red food after they observed others eating red food that was treated so as to be noxious.  Studies on nonavian species have not produced similar results, leading researchers to speculate that avian social learning may be fundamentally different from that of mammals.

      But Sherwin’s recent experiments with domestic hens do not support the notion that avian social learning necessarily facilitates aversion to novel foods that are noxious or toxic.  Even when demonstrator hens reacted with obvious disgust to a specific food, via vigorous head shaking and bill wiping, there was no evidence that observers subsequently avoided eating that food. Sherwin’s research team speculated that ecological or social constraints during the evolution of this species might have resulted in there being little benefit from the social learning of unpalatability, for instance, selective pressures for this mode of learning would be reduced if the birds rarely encountered noxious or toxic food or rarely interacted after eating such food, or if the consequences of ingestion were minimal. In a related experiment, the same researchers showed that if observer hens watched demonstrator hens react favorably to food of a particular color, then observer hens ate more food of that color than they ate of food of other colors. These results confirmed that avian species can develop preferences for palatable food through social learning.

 


Q3:

The primary purpose of the passage is to discuss the

A.      techniques used in certain experiments on social learning in birds

B.      reasons for the differences between social learning in birds and in mammals

C.      question of how social learning manifests itself in birds

D.      basis for a widespread belief about a difference in behavior between birds and mammals

E.       possible reasons why birds may or may not learn from each other in a particular way

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:

According to the passage, which of the following is true of the experiments on domestic hens conducted by Sherwin’s research team?

             

A.      Only a small number of observer hens appeared to learn to avoid food that was demonstrated by other hens to be noxious.

B.      Observer hens ingested food preferentially only after numerous instances of witnessing demonstrator hens preferentially ingest that type of food.

C.      Observer hens appeared unable to recognize when demonstrator hens found a particular food especially palatable.

D.      Demonstrator hens reacted adversely to ingesting certain novel foods.

E.       Demonstrator hens altered their behavior less obviously in response to noxious foods than in response to highly palatable foods.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding the results of the recent experiments conducted by Sherwin’s research team?

A.      The experiments demonstrate that social learning in avian species facilitates the identification of noxious or toxic foods.

B.      The experiments suggest that social learning has made avian species less adept than nonavian species at learning to prefer beneficial foods and avoid noxious and toxic foods.



C.      The experiments undermine the notion that most avian species have evolved in environments where there is little benefit to the social learning of unpalatability.

D.      The experiments suggest that the acquisition of food preferences in avian species is largely unaffected by social learning.

E.       The experiments show that social learning in avian species can promote the preferential consumption of beneficial foods but do not support the claim that social learning in avian species promotes the avoidance of noxious or toxic foods.

-----------------

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-31 15:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部