ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1166|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助feifei75

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-13 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

求助feifei75

75. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

为什么c啊 完全没思路 请教高人。。。我17号就要上了 一个字 慌

沙发
发表于 2009-4-14 10:19:00 | 只看该作者

别慌,我翻译一下题目,你就做出来了

广告商总是被指责说故意操纵人们的品味和嗜好。但是,一些证据表明,广告商在除了利益方面考虑之外还会考虑道德因素。有这么一个出版物,为了吸引更多的读者,从以前的家庭主题转到了性和暴力主题。 说一些广告商因此而撤出了出版物,一定是因为在道德上不认同出版物

C 选项, 广告商继续和刊物合作会盈利,撤出会亏损

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-14 10:58:00 | 只看该作者
懂了。。。就是说排除了经济是上利益的考虑就剩下道德的考虑了。。。谢谢 !
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-14 08:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部