ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1393|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LR0410-4-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-10 16:41:00 | 只看该作者

LR0410-4-20

Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from the past 25 years is covered by the Acme retirement plan. Since the winners of the nations's most prestigious award for economists have thus clearly recognized that the Acme plan offers them a financially secure future, it is probably a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs.

the advertisment's argumentation is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

the correct answer is D: It takes for granted that some winners of the Economic Merit Prize have deliberately selected the Acme retirement plan, rather than having had it chosen for them by their employers.

I do not see any relation between being a good plan and whether or not the plan is chosen by these winners themselves, so I do not understand why D is right.

沙发
发表于 2009-3-10 20:31:00 | 只看该作者
conclusion: economists CHOSE plan because they think it's the best for them

implied assumption: the economists CHOSE the plans

Answer:  this argument takes for granted that the economists CHOSE their plans, in other words, they might have been FORCED to be covered by this retirement plan. 
( And if that's the case, then the argument is flawed.)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 01:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部