ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sophia417
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD5-Q1

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2010-7-19 11:06:40 | 只看该作者
又把这道题翻出来了,希望有NN能解释一下,C选项貌似用独立主格也解释的通,想不明白~~~~~~
高人快快出现~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- by 会员 zhaoshj88 (2010/4/21 23:28:42)



我想C不对,应该是因为前后两个结构不一样,不能够省略系动词
32#
发表于 2010-8-10 13:39:33 | 只看该作者
顶顶!
33#
发表于 2010-9-5 09:50:18 | 只看该作者
DDDDDDDDDD
34#
发表于 2010-9-15 19:39:13 | 只看该作者
我解释一下划线部分倒装后and 和系动词省略的问题:这里并没有省略。无论是不是倒装结构,这里都不能有and和系动词。因为划线部分必须是一个倒装的独立主格,否则就会造成一个病句。
这道题里面的句子太长,我用一个简单的句子说明:Her smile is so beautiful, and her voice is so nice, that I am totally lost.
注意这是一个病句, 因为so...that句型中,that前面是不能有逗号的。如果想让这个so that结构成立的话,划线部分必须改成独立主格。
Her smile is so beautiful(, her voice so nice,) that I am totally lost.
因为我们可以把独立主格连同其前后2个逗号一起拔掉分析句子,所以这个句子的so that 结构就是完整的。

-- by 会员 松鼠gg (2009/7/18 12:51:00)



nn
35#
发表于 2010-9-19 10:07:33 | 只看该作者
对于本题的一点拙见.
首先,根据本句意思可以分析出来,前面的由"so"引导的两个句子,是做状语成分.其意思不与主句有任何关联.本句所要表达的中心内容是Smith和Roosevelt想要雇佣FP.前面两句,论其内容,都是用来修饰FP这个人的,所以逻辑上来说,两句必须构成并列形式.
其次,白勇语法不止一次提到过,两句并列,如果前句有"be"或者"become"后句-必须-省略.

所以,第二句省略"Be",又在句型上与前句构成并列对称,所以选择E.

此题排除E的原因是,如果,将第二句理解为独立主格,那么从"she"可以看出,主语是FP,整句的主语也是FP,但是,整句话的中心应该是Smith和Roosevelt,所以不选C.
36#
发表于 2011-5-28 16:18:14 | 只看该作者
==
37#
发表于 2012-5-14 20:37:35 | 只看该作者
《Prep语法笔记》中经常提到的:
两个句子并列,第一个句子含有be动词,第二个句子中的be动词必须省略,同时,一些重复的名词或形容词也必须省略,但是be功能不同时不能省略.

38#
发表于 2013-8-11 13:29:46 | 只看该作者
haonan15110 发表于 2010-7-19 01:13
愚人之见:E很工整,so+adj+倒装,so+adj+倒装,that。虽然少了个and,但仍可接受。C中Frances Perkins’ i ...

终于看到一个说c和d选项原因的了!谢谢!
39#
发表于 2013-11-3 02:21:08 | 只看该作者
总结一下这道题希望大家都能看到:Ron大神回复说这种提法是一种古老的idiom,现在考试已经不会考了,不用去纠结它。If it's a correct answer, it's a correct answer.

This is a really, really old problem (over 10 years old, if it's in "set 27"). The current GMAT won't test such oddly constructed sentences, so it's best to forget about this one altogether.


This sentence is as legitimate today as it was 10, 50, or 100 years ago.
The problem is that it's an unusual sentence construction, one that violates the dominant patterns of usage. Essentially, it's one giant "idiom" with which you'd have to be familiar in advance -- it's not the kind of thing you can figure out as you go. As such, it unfairly favors native English speakers, who have had much more exposure to "weird but correct" English sentences than have non-native speakers. Basically, it's almost like taking English from Shakespeare, or Spanish from Cervantes, or Italian from Dante, and throwing them at modern-day second-language speakers of those languages. Not fair.

In recent years GMAC has been cracking down on just about all SC items that unfairly favor native speakers -- especially weird sentence constructions like this one. So, it's not any less correct than it previously was, but you don't have to worry about it on the test anymore.
40#
发表于 2014-11-7 09:29:59 | 只看该作者
同意还原原句应该有and和was
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 06:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部