In colonial Connecticut between 妇女在18世纪参与主要关于债务的官
1670 and 1719, women participated 司数量一直减少。
in one of every six civil cases, the
Line vast majority of which were debt-
(5) related. Women’s participation
dropped to one in ten cases after
1719, and to one in twenty by the
1770’s. however, as Cornelia 但是CHD在其著作中说数据是假的。
Hughes Dayton notes in Women 妇女参与官司多了,只是男人参与的
(10) Before the Bar: Gender, Law, 官司增加更快。
and Society in Connecticut,
1639-1789, these statistics are
somewhat deceptive: in fact,
both the absolute numbers and
(15) the percentage of adult women
participating in civil cases grew
steadily throughout the eighteenth
century, but the legal activity of
men also increased dramatically,
(20) and at a much faster rate. Single, 虽然各种妇女仍像以前那样追究债务
married, and widowed women 人责任,她们的法律地位变了许多。
continued to pursue their own and
their husbands’ debtors through
legal action much as they had
(25) done in the previous century, but
despite this continuity, their place
in the legal system shifted
dramatically. Men’s commercial 男人由于拥有债权人能力,其商业利益
interests and credit networks 和信用网络越来越广泛。
(30) became increasingly far-flung,
owing in part to the ability of
creditors to buy and sell prom-
issory notes (legal promises to
pay debts). At the same time, 而妇女的信用债务网络仍主要是当地
(35) women’s networks of credit and 和私人的。
debt remained primarily local and
personal. Dayton contends that, CHD说妇女虽然继续服务社区,但被
although still performing crucial 置于18世纪新经济与法律文化外。
economic services in their
(40) communities—services that
contributed to the commercialization
of the colonial economy—women
remained for the most part outside
the new economic and legal culture
of the eighteenth century.
-------------------------------------