ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The results of the company's cost- cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3121|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD24-8 时态我不明白 with我更不明白

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-1 18:48:00 | 只看该作者

GWD24-8 时态我不明白 with我更不明白

GWD-24-8        GWD-TN-10-8

The results of the company’s cost- cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.

A.      which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell

B.       which had increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it had fallen

C.      which have increased five percent during the first three months of this year after falling

D.      with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after falling

E.       with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after having fallen

答案是C

我选E

理由如下:

(1)按前人解释,with独立主格,或修饰主句主语,或修饰离其最近的名词

        此处根据逻辑意思判断,不应该修饰主句主语,所以只能修饰profits

(2)时间轴上应该先是the last two years,然后再是first three months of this year,如果是这样,E中的having fallen不是很符 合时态吗? 

这个题对于我来说很好,因为考察的都是我的弱点

我始终不清楚with的用法

对过去完成时和一般过去时的判断也有些迷糊(虽然一直非常清楚“过去的过去”才会使用过去完成时,但在实际判断中很容易出错,多是把应该使用一般过去时的判断成为过去完成时)

请大家帮忙答疑解惑

多谢

祝大家牛年都变大牛牛


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-1 18:49:31编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-2 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
UP UP UP UP UP UP UP
板凳
发表于 2009-1-2 16:19:00 | 只看该作者

首先,e是错的,having fallen表示两年前一直到现在,但事实是到今年前三个月前,动作应该就停止了,所以不能选c

并不是with的问题

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-3 12:55:00 | 只看该作者
UP UP UP UP UP UP UP
5#
发表于 2009-1-4 02:23:00 | 只看该作者
after having done something是不可能對的
1. after巳表示the sequence of events.  沒有必要用having done來表示前後
2. 可是after someone/something has/have done something是acceptable; 如果變成after someone/something did something也可以
LZ可以多利用search function here...很多前在的NN的精彩discussion都在其中
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-4 12:47:00 | 只看该作者
知道了 谢谢~~
7#
发表于 2009-11-25 16:16:14 | 只看该作者
我仍然认为with有错误,with修饰的是之前一个分句的主语,这里的主语是its,但是with应该修饰的是profits。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 01:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部