- UID
- 280443
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-10-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>新人</i>在2008-12-7 18:10:00的发言:</b><br/><p>I do not think that courses of LSE is more challenging than CFA 2. Many peopla take CFA 2 after thay complete graduate study.</p><p>actually, if is true, then I will think the courses of Purdue is also more chanllenging than CFA 2, because it is very quantitative. </p><p>The important thing is that it is hard to land a job in UK while it is easier to land a job in US and the reputation of LSE is declining quickly in China these years. </p><p>one girl from Warwick said that their courses is very challenging, however she only got 7000 one month. But the students who purdue MSF is US rarelly come back to China. In my intern company, only one from Purdue, however, lots from UK and Australia. Why?</p><p></p></div><p></p><p>well girl, i dont know who you are. However, i am deadly sure that LSE MsF is tough...if you dont believe, come and have try, or just make an application. It will only cost less than 400 rmb... and LSE is nice, no deposit is required. </p><p>furthermore, i dont see why you posted this if you have already made up your mind. and please , please, be nice and respectable to everyone here and to a reputable school with so many <span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">nobel laureates....</span></p> |
|