|
我觉得楼主的思路是对的,这里能请教一下楼主一道题吗,主要是想向你问一下我的思路对不对,题目如下: That social institutions influence the formation of character has become a generally accepted proposition. This doctrine views individuals as but compiant recipients of social influence: personalities are entirely the products of society, and at any point in life an individual's personality can be changed by management of the social world. Crime is said to exist only because society has in some ways failed in its responsibility to give every person the resources to lead a productive life. However, whereas it is true that some persons will commit crimes no matter how well society treats them.
Which of the following is implied by the "doctrine" (line one) described in the passage above?
A Social instituitions may reflect personality as much as they shape it B Social influence on personality is most stronogly felt by the affluent C The concentration of wealth in the hands of a privileged few accounts for the existence of crime D Bringing about social reform is the most likely means of curtailing crime E Less severe punishment of crime would be likely to result in more time.
套用你做题分析时的思路,这段话主要讲:social institutions 影响 人的行为, Crime 是人的行为。 选项D说: 改变社会结构可以改变人的行为,正解。 请楼主抽出时间点评一下我的思路,谢谢 |