ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1155|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[请教]大全11-13 还是不理解

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-10 12:35:00 | 只看该作者

[请教]大全11-13 还是不理解

Some governments have tried to make alcohol and tobacco less attractive to consumers by regulating what can be shown in advertisements for these products, rather than by banning advertising of them altogether. However, the need to obey the letter of these restrictions has actually stimulated advertisers to create advertisements that are more inventive and humorous than they were prior to the restrictions’ introduction.

which of the following, if true, would, in conjunction with the statements above, best support the conclusion that the government policy described above fails to achieve its objective?

A)    Because of the revenues gained from the sale of alcohol and tobacco, governments have no real interest in making these products less attractive to consumers.

B)     Advertisers tend to create inventive and humorous advertisements only if they have some particular reason to do so.

C)    Banning advertising of alcohol and tobacco is a particularly effective way of making these products less attractive to consumers.

D)    With the policy in place, advertisements for alcohol and tobacco have become far more inventive and humorous than advertisements for other kinds of products.

E)The more inventive an advertisement is, the more attractive it makes the advertised product appear.

这道题目明明是support conclusion,但搜索的帖子里却说是削弱题。

Answer: E

我一点头绪也没有,望牛牛们不吝赐教。谢谢!!!

沙发
发表于 2008-10-10 13:29:00 | 只看该作者
不懂什么support,削弱,不过答案是E很明显就行了啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-11 00:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部