ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1110|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og_10_030

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-11 14:49:00 | 只看该作者

og_10_030

The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.

Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

(A) The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
(B) The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
(D) Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

能否有人讲下这道题的思路。
沙发
发表于 2008-9-11 15:11:00 | 只看该作者
CD里有讨论帖,楼主自己看看
板凳
发表于 2008-9-13 03:27:00 | 只看该作者
HISTORICAL COST CACULATION= PREVIOUS PRICE PAID + INFLATION ADJUSTMENT

问要WEAKEN "HISTORICAL COST as an economically sound pricing method", 因此要找出这种做法的不合理之处, 只有A是对的, 因为PREVIOUS PRICE PAID已经不合理了, 所以累计还是不合理
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-16 22:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部