ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2140|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑技法请教第1题?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-20 13:14:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑技法请教第1题?

"fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and the delays in the production, Not only does it speed up production, but it also assures quality. The reason is that the bottlenecks and delays can not be eliminated unless all works is done right the first time.

The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that

A) any flaw in the work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occuring on a "fast cycle" production line.

其他几个答案可排除,但我对a不太理解尤其是提干最后一句话和结论的关系?
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-22 02:48:00 | 只看该作者
Nobody answers me. 55555!
板凳
发表于 2004-1-22 23:05:00 | 只看该作者
中文意思是“快速周转”可以解决生产中的瓶颈和拖延,不仅如此,它还可以解决质量问题。因为只有第一次就作好,才能彻底消除产生瓶颈和拖延的问题。
也就是说任何质量问题问题,都会导致瓶颈等问题
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-23 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢
5#
发表于 2004-1-24 10:48:00 | 只看该作者
我从逻辑技法上补充一下:

not A unless B
so not b -----> not (not A)
then not b ----> a
is that right ?

the author assumes that all works is not done right the first time then the bottlenecks and delays canbe eliminated. Is that correct? of course not!
because some works are not relate to the bottlenecks and delays .

that is the author's questionable presupposition :
any flaw in the work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occuring on a "fast cycle" production line.

Hope that is helpful to you!

Happy new year!


6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-28 11:56:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
7#
发表于 2004-1-28 13:47:00 | 只看该作者
再来罗嗦两句

题目的结构是A可以非B,同时认为A应该可以C,因为B和C的关系。我们不需要去理会这个解释本身是否正确,全当它是正确的,但这个解释本身是不完整的,它欠缺了一个“do right”和“assure qulity”之间关系的说明
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-2 14:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部