|
我先各自把原题帖一下 GWD1-Q21: That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.
A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation 答案是E啦，我选B，原因一会下面会提到 49. The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet (A) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting (B) doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit (C) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known in orbit around (D) doubling to twelve the number of satellites now
known as orbiting (E) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites
now known that orbit The pronoun which should be used to refer to a previously mentioned noun, not to the idea expressed in an entire clause. In A, C, and E, which seems to refer to a vague concept involving the detection of moons, but there is no specific noun, such as detection, to which it can refer. Also in E, the use of the phrasing the number... now known that orbit is ungrammatical and unclear. B and D use the correct participial form, doubling, to modify the preceding clause, but D, like A, uses known as orbiting rather than known to orbit, a phrase that is more idiomatic in context. B, therefore, is the best answer. http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=514550&id=58971&page=1&skin=0&Star=1 这是当年的讨论帖，rt316老大问的问题跟我一样：我想知道在这里名词从句和has doubled是否在逻辑上匹配，dicovery和has doubled在逻辑上是否也匹配？因为两者的强调的核心主语其实不同。这道题没有被问过，想来大家都没有问题，但我却很困惑。 但是LES老大让去看请参考OG49的解释。注意题目形式完全不同，但说明了此种逻辑关系是正确的。特别是其中“the idea expressed in an entire clause.” 我看了之后完全模糊，果然只是小小弟，49那道题我是跟据XDF的规则做的，就是修饰前面一整句话用ing形式或新名词，但和这个GWD的题有什么关系呢，E选项The discovery后面跟动词has doubled符合逻辑嘛，我没想通，最多也只能说是“使翻倍”，请教大家了 请参考OG49的解释。注意题目形式完全不同，但说明了此种逻辑关系是正确的。特别是其中“the idea expressed in an entire clause.” 我看了之后完全模糊，果然只是小小弟，49那道题我是跟据XDF的规则做的，就是修饰前面一整句话用ing形式或新名词，但和这个GWD的题有什么关系呢，E选项The discovery后面跟动词has doubled符合逻辑嘛，我没想通，最多也只能说是“使翻倍”，请教大家了  | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-9-4 21:02:00
楼主
