ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3159|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全5-20,请教题意or翻译。。没太看懂,多谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-9 17:50:00 | 只看该作者

大全5-20,请教题意or翻译。。没太看懂,多谢

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.

(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.C

(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

沙发
发表于 2008-8-25 11:02:00 | 只看该作者
期待NN解答。这题我也没太明白为什么选C
板凳
发表于 2008-8-26 06:44:00 | 只看该作者
confused also... 
地板
发表于 2008-8-27 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

答案是C吗?

C的解释应该是这样的,因为strike如果outlaw的话,那政府就会有损失,因为有Binding arbitration ,所以,政府应该outlaw其他一些XXXX的STRIKE,就是没有BA的

所以如果是要CONCLUSION的话,应该就是说BA这方面的吧? 

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-3 18:11:00 | 只看该作者

还是没太明白,请教NN

6#
发表于 2009-6-4 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(taixiKim)大全5-20,请教题意or翻译。。没太...

个人理解:

outlaw strikes --> disputes settled by binding arbitration  --1

outlaw strikes only for public -sector workers      --2

1+2,  binding arbitratoin 与 public workers 有关系 ,选C

7#
发表于 2009-6-6 11:18:00 | 只看该作者
outlaw strikes --> disputes settled by binding arbitration without negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators
Binding arbitration guided by public-sector labor settlements tends to more favor for public-service workers.
Local government generally favor public-service workers. (This is a common knowledge in USA)
Therefore, outlaw strikes
--> no guiding arbitrators --> no good for government --> is a costly mistake

So C is the best choice.

8#
发表于 2009-7-29 17:43:00 | 只看该作者
coask
9#
发表于 2012-1-5 21:33:23 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-11 12:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部