| 
 
 
 Whichof the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically
 completes the argument below?
 
 Accordingto a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental
 regulations reduces economic growth.  This hypothesis is undermined
 by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental
 regulations also have the highest economic growth.  This fact does
 not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however,
 since ______.
 
 Could anybody here explay why A? or the answer is wrong?those
 states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most
 in education and job training
 
even
 those states that have only moderately strict environmental
 regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict
 regulations
 
many
 states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering
 weakening their environmental regulations
 
after
 introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states
 experienced increased economic growth
 
even
 those states with very weak environmental regulations have
 experienced at least some growth
 
 Thanks in advance!
 
 
 |