ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2159|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

本月CRJJ某道疑惑题,snow geese

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-16 12:15:00 | 只看该作者

本月CRJJ某道疑惑题,snow geese

这道题我认为是B,GWD讨论的也是B,但是之前有个朋友说是D,说是来自新东方老师的答案,大家讨论下,Thx

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
沙发
发表于 2008-6-16 12:29:00 | 只看该作者
vote for B
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-16 13:41:00 | 只看该作者
刚才在Q群上讨论了一下,貌似有很多人都对D特别不屑~~~~~~~~
地板
发表于 2008-6-16 13:57:00 | 只看该作者

能讲讲B的理由吗?

其实我是支持D的,我原来看到b的时候,没有理解b有何理由.

我的d理由如下:

snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions

那么如果geese搬家,不在southern regions 过,那么即便取消对打猎的限制也没有用.

当然也有逻辑问题:搬家不等于就搬出southern regions.

但是我依旧没有明白B的理由.请教下~

5#
发表于 2008-6-16 15:39:00 | 只看该作者

sharp increase就是B的理由

好好理解这个短语

6#
发表于 2008-6-16 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

sharp increase?

增长很快就打猎也没用?推不出啊~

请恕愚钝~愿听详解~

7#
发表于 2008-6-16 16:53:00 | 只看该作者

海鸟的最近的突然增加

狩猎限制令已经出来很多年了 (B选项)

海鸟如果增加也是在狩猎限制令颁布前后有一个sharp increase

而不是现在,现在的sharp increase一定另有他因

8#
发表于 2008-6-16 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
D啊,D是对原题结论的直接削弱,这是最强的削弱。B也削弱,但是对原体结论的支持理由削弱,所以弃之
9#
发表于 2008-6-16 17:47:00 | 只看该作者

我对这个题目理解的帖子, 大家可以讨论, 我支持D,

呵呵...pharmacystar MM可以看看我的帖子..然后驳倒我的推理...另恭喜今天770

链接如下:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&replyID=2962839&id=328776

10#
发表于 2008-6-16 18:07:00 | 只看该作者

stavan,increase和sharp increase是两码事

sharp increase是短期内突然的增加

作者认为禁令与sharp increase有关,

我们就是驳斥这个因果关系

B 禁令颁布很多年了,sharp increase应该出现在颁布禁令的前后,而不是现在

现在只能是steady increase

所以,sharp increase另有他因

把题再读一遍,仔细读一遍

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-30 15:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部