康奈尔和弗吉尼亚

三十以后

Two schools are really close in terms of ranking and many aspects. and you won't be wrong by entering either.

So its really a choice of:

learning method (case vs. less case), location(2 hours to DC vs. 4 hours to any major city), intensitity(very intense vs. medium intense), brand(IVEY League vs. public university), weather(cold vs. warmer)

I would encourage you to talk to current students and Alumni, and understand the difference from their perspective.

hswdream

tough choice

kidmann

It's interesting you guys mention Darden being an INTENSE school.  What
will be some of the laid-back (non-intense) schools in
Top 15?  Honestly, I want to study as little as possible in the two years during the MBA.

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-9 6:45:45编辑过]

三十以后

以下是引用kidmann在2008-4-9 6:43:00的发言：
It's interesting you guys mention Darden being an INTENSE school.  What
will be some of the laid-back (non-intense) schools in
Top 15?  Honestly, I want to study as little as possible in the two years during the MBA.

my general impression: Wharton, Darden, MIT, Chicago, HBS are pretty intense

Kellogg, Stanford, Duke, Austin are lighter

no offens, just my general impression, anyone may correct me if I am wrong.

evasylu

Congs to LZ夫婦!

I will go to Cornell with my bf and I choose Cornell for its Finance prestige,location and Ivy league.
Go with us

Ava120

Darden is better

soniashi

以下是引用cheeyong在2008-4-9 2:46:00的发言：
darden和cornell的校友呢，进来发言啊。

我不认为校友会推荐非自家学校啊。。。。。

kidmann

But soniashi didn't recommend Darden though

流浪猫猫2008

Cornell

soniashi

以下是引用kidmann在2008-4-9 12:16:00的发言：
But soniashi didn't recommend Darden though

因为我不了解学校啊

自己都还没去

虽然感觉上我觉得Darden比较好

这个就是一个fit 好像我们写的essay啦

其实没有一定清清楚楚谁好谁差啊