ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1267|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教prep一道题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-28 09:35:00 | 只看该作者

请教prep一道题

13.
            
(26741-!-item-!-188;#058&002910)

 

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

 

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators--most of which are exported to Europe.  However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market.  The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States.  If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

 

(A) some United States manufacturers have been substantially increasing their output over the last several years

(B) the efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did

(C) just as European manufacturers enjoy certain competitive advantages in Europe, so do United States manufacturers in the United States

(D) European governments are currently undertaking initiatives to stimulate the use of solar power within Europe

(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited

 

我选的是E可是答案是C。为什么E不对呢?

现在的market需求有限导致US的太阳能设备出口,而政府的举措能刺激这种设备的需求,因此以后不出口也没有关系了。这逻辑思路为什么不对?

C有些类比的意思我明白,但是觉得E更正确啊

 

跪求NN解释!

沙发
发表于 2008-3-1 09:54:00 | 只看该作者
This is a very ticky question!

E is not correct because the expanded US market could be taken advantage of by European manufacturers, unless C is correct. Therefore C is more fundamentally correct.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-1 12:53:00 | 只看该作者

先谢谢鸟!

要考虑那么多道弯呀?我觉得我的脑子肯定转不过来……

地板
发表于 2008-3-1 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
E: increasing US market does not always lead to advantages to US manufacturers, especially in this open market in global ages. Every manufacturer can compete in the increased US market. If US manufacturers are not competetive enough, it is not going to benefit US manufactuers at all.
5#
发表于 2008-3-2 00:19:00 | 只看该作者
贸易壁垒,扩大内需,出口转内销
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-28 08:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部