- UID
- 313684
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
[讨论]请各位大侠拍砖,小弟ibt作文处女作
小弟初来乍到,第一次写ibt作文,望各位不吝赐教. 题目是关于agree or disagree 把land用来造farm或工厂还是用来保护濒危物种.
Whether we should help endangered animals or give ourselves profits is a dilemma. Different people hold different opinions due to their distinct backgrounds and experiences. As for me, I strongly disagree that it is more important to use land for human than to save for endangered animals. The reasons are as follows. First of all, if we do not save endangered animals, the ecosystem will be totally destroyed. Take some fish as an example. Some experts in China has found a kind of fish called Junmasi which live in Yangtzi River is exinct because the fish’s living area was destroyed by the factories’ polluted water. So somewhat we used their so called land. Then something horrible happened. After the fish had been extinct, many other kinds of fish was extinct. How confusing it is! That case is not rare. In reality, the only reason is that we destroyed the ecosystem. In the second place, let us think about the harmony of the world. If we keep farming the land and establishing the building all over the world, all the species will become endangered. Suppose that the whole world is full of artificial things such as ranches, factories etc. without birds’ singing. We can hardly imagine how scaring it is. In a word, nothing can be more important than the harmony of the world. Certainly, using land for human has its own merits like making fortune and food, but we have to say that all these excuses can not change the earth’s future. Actually we can always find a way to solve our own problems by the development of technology. We should try to raise the rate of land’s utility. So it is undoubtedly that we need more science than land and we can leave the land to endangered animals that need it more. In summary, it is wiser for us to save endangered animals by returning them land. As I have presented above, it will protect the ecosystem and it will keep the harmony of the world. Also its disadvantages can be solved by hi-tech. All in all, this choice is meaningful. |
|