| 
 Topic: if we need “never, never give up” or not~~
 
 Outline:  
 Beginning: phenomenon→debate→granted 
   
                                        Leader of army: lost of life 
 Reason1:Waste:
 
 Researchers: wrong direction 
 Reason2: Badhabits→throw away
 
 Reason3: Sacrifice→Slow down the development of society 
 Conclude: Hinderof the advancement (Paraphrase of the beginning)
 
   
 Having long been debated that if we need theinspiringly plausible slogan “ never, never give up” or not, this notion now
 gradually leads the minority to form the concept that the excellent goes to the
 consistent. Granted, it is known to all that persistence do have some merits in
 a few situations. But I support the counterpart of it, for this can only means
 waste, viciousness and sacrifice.
 
 Following the doctrine, that “never, never give up”,some people, such as extremists, can lose multiple best-and-least
 opportunities. Having the risk that they may be frenzy or zealous, we should
 recognize the adverse part of this slogan. Let’s picture this, what will happen
 if a general march his solders to assault the enemy even though he has already
 known the impossibility? And let’s just put this, what if the researchers
 investigate on something that they known can only lead to failure? They are all
 of meaningless and should be regarded as waste, just like the addictions.
 
 The death will eventually lays on the people withoutabandonment of their vicious habits. Drug and alcohol that saw a rapid boom in
 our society, have came into exist long before, but only in recent several
 decades did they have the connection with addiction, crime and death.
 Consequently, elimination is required instead of insistence towards the bad
 habits, or the step of progression will be slowed down.
 
 Sacrifice, which is caused by over-persistence, will only exhaust ourlimited resources. The unparalleled
 advancement is now been experienced by our society that diversity and variability
 are becoming increasingly catchy, while the monotone and dullness are gradually
 being abjured. Therefore, the hinder of social development, such as the sacrifice
 and the advocate of the “never, never give up” will finally be rejected.
 
 The boosting of economy, the lifting of civilizationand the rocketing of living standard all desire an recognition that conceive
 whole attributes of different things. Granted, persistence sparks people of
 different era a lot. But compared with the things that be brought alone with, exhaust,
 immolation and abuse, “never, never give up” doesn’t adapt to the tendency of
 current development. So, in a word, I doesn’t agree with it.
 
 
  |