ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1518|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

都不太明白,LAWYER,救救我!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-1-14 15:10:00 | 只看该作者

都不太明白,LAWYER,救救我!!!

Question 17-18

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

17. Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?

(A) The arts of life have no useful end.

(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.

(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.

(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.

(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

18. If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.

(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life.

(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.

(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”

(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.

19. There are at least three people in the room. At most two people in the room recognize each other. At least one person in the room recognizes everybody else in the room.

Which one of the following is NOT consistent with the above?

(A) Four people are in the room

(B) No two people in the room recognize each other.

(C) At most one person in the room recognizes everybody else in the room.

(D) Anyone in the room who recognizes any other person in the room is also recognized by that person..

(E) Two people in the room recognize every one else in the room.

沙发
发表于 2008-1-14 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

17题选C么。。。我都不清楚我读懂没。。

C取非说building wearing close什么的比natrual差,文章的意思是这些比natrual好?所以C是assumption?

板凳
发表于 2008-1-14 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

19题选C么,C和E好象是矛盾的,E那种情况可以的,那么C就不对了,请指正

18题选C么?

这些是LSAT的题吧,真怪啊。。
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-14 17:01:46编辑过]
地板
发表于 2008-1-14 23:32:00 | 只看该作者

是什么题目?跟GMAT思路不太一样

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-15 12:59:00 | 只看该作者
19题我自己想通了,同时揭晓答案,D. 画个图,因为题目说至少有三人,我们就假定为三人A\B\C,至多两人相互认出,我们就假定A和B相互认出,但至少有一人认出房内其它所有人,那么假定A是那个人,那么它认出B和C,而如果D正确的话(C也能认出A),那么就违背了"至多两人相互认出"(因为有三人能相互认出),基于对称性,如果A换成B,情况也一样. 如果C是那个人,那么他能认出A和B,那么如果D正确的话,A和B也应能认出他,那么相互认识的人也是三人,那么就违背了"至多两人相互认出",所以选D. 问题是我对题干的理解有误, NOT CONSISTENT的补集是CONSISTENT吗? 应该不是,因为很多选项都是可能符合, 而不是一定符合,这里可能问的就是一定不符合了,审题吃了大亏!!!!!
6#
发表于 2008-1-15 14:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用SCOTT2008在2008-1-15 12:59:00的发言:
19题我自己想通了,同时揭晓答案,D. 画个图,因为题目说至少有三人,我们就假定为三人A\B\C,至多两人相互认出,我们就假定A和B相互认出,但至少有一人认出房内其它所有人,那么假定A是那个人,那么它认出B和C,而如果D正确的话(C也能认出A),那么就违背了"至多两人相互认出"(因为有三人能相互认出),基于对称性,如果A换成B,情况也一样. 如果C是那个人,那么他能认出A和B,那么如果D正确的话,A和B也应能认出他,那么相互认识的人也是三人,那么就违背了"至多两人相互认出",所以选D. 问题是我对题干的理解有误, NOT CONSISTENT的补集是CONSISTENT吗? 应该不是,因为很多选项都是可能符合, 而不是一定符合,这里可能问的就是一定不符合了,审题吃了大亏!!!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-15 15:03:37编辑过]
7#
发表于 2008-1-18 11:15:00 | 只看该作者

答案是什么啊?

我选择

C D D

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-21 13:10:00 | 只看该作者
CED
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-26 17:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部