- UID
- 46
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Q: Sherry, Kenan-Flagler dipped to No. 18 in BusinessWeek's 2002 MBA rankings. Has that affected the school's ability to attract students? A: Not in a negative way. We've gotten positive statements from the market -- from recruiters and alumni on return-on-investment, on specific programs, and on the school overall. Those statements have been a net positive. This year, we're benefiting from a lot of enthusiasm for our new dean.
Q: Since we last spoke, the school recruited a dean from Australia, Steve Jones. Robert Sullivan, the former dean, left for the University of California at San Diego's new B-school. How has the change affected the school spirit on campus? A: Steve has a lot of very positive qualities, one of which is his enthusiasm for the program. As a double alumnus, I can appreciate the level of passion that a fellow alumnus brings to the job in addition to his tremendous professional background. He has a sincere desire to give back [to the community] and to add value to the school.He also brings a McKinsey-trained consulting mind, and he has helped us focus. At the moment, a team is leading a strategic review of the school, and his leadership is making that more productive.
Q: How has the new-found focus affected your office? A: Our focus in admissions is a lot sharper. We're zeroing in on the attributes that are most closely correlated with success down the road. We're trying to align the post-MBA expectations we have for our students with what we see on the front-end.
We're still admitting many of the same kinds of students, but we're doing a better job of spotting people who may have been on the margin and looked less appealing because of a single indicator that doesn't determine success down the line. For instance, there's a point where every candidate is smart. The dean doesn't want us to worry about increasing an average or a statistic, such as the GMAT score or [undergraduate] GPA of the class, if we're not also looking for proven teamwork and leadership abilities and a track record of getting things done.
We want to enroll people who can handle a rigorous curriculum, and who are driven. It's not that those things weren't always part of the package, but we're emphasizing them more.
Q: Does UNC assign different weights to parts of its MBA application? A: It would be easier if we did sometimes. But no, we don't. Still, if you see something that's severely out of line, it probably carries more weight than something else that's in the average range.
Q: Word on the street is that application volume is lower in 2003 than it has been in years. What trends are you noticing at Kenan-Flagler? A: Unfortunately it's hard to say, since I changed the admissions deadlines from last year. This year we have four deadlines, down from five in 2002. If the deadlines were exactly as they were in 2002, then applications are flat. My sense is that we're certainly down, vs. two or three years ago. But the first deadline is such a small percentage of what we'll get overall that it's not a big enough sample to forecast. I can't say we'll see applications down 20% or 30%. After the second deadline in early December, I'll have a much better idea.I'm optimistic that we'll enroll a strong class. I've been on the road with my staff since August, and we've done a lot of interviews, fairs, and forums to get in front of people early. The applicants I've interacted with have been very strong and knowledgeable about what it takes to be successful. The economic situation is not news to them, so they're coming to the table a lot more prepared and realistic.
Q: In 2003, your office accepted 36% of applicants, more than in 2002 (30%) and 2001 (24%). Are you likely to accept more applicants still in 2004? A: Our philosophy has always been to go after the best candidates. There are ways that admissions offices can play with their pool and admit only the people they think are going to accept the offer, or recruit in areas where they've got a good track record. I have a responsibility to bring in the best students I can get and to not play games. I don't worry about the percent we admit. I worry about the quality of the students who enroll. I feel that every year the quality of the students gets stronger.
Q: Last year, some 40% of your applicants were from outside the U.S., but your class ended up just 26% international. Is there a policy to enroll fewer students from abroad, perhaps given the difficult economic environment? A: We had a big drop-off two years ago in international applications, but in 2002 to 2003 we saw them rebound. We don't have a policy, but we have a responsibility to give all of our candidates, and particularly our international candidates, as much information as possible about their prospects of working in the U.S. after they graduate.
When I travel, I'm clear with them. I tell them, "This is what it was at graduation. This is what it was 90 days later. Here's where we are now." Right now, 86.2% of all U.S. and permanent residents from the class of 2003 have found jobs, vs. 69% of foreign nationals. Only a candidate can determine if the investment is worth it. I always ask them, "How are you going to measure your return-on-investment?" If a candidate says, "I've got to have a job at graduation in the U.S. making x amount of dollars," that gives me pause. I need to know that such a person has a backup plan.
And that's not just in terms of what kind of job a student may get but also of financing the MBA. Both may be contributing to lower enrollment of foreign nationals. It just works out that way. We're also trying to balance the class, and some countries have an disproportionate share of applicants.
Q: Which countries send the most applicants? A: India, China, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Canada, Thailand, Argentina, and Mexico. You can draw a line after Brazil, and that top group would be where we see the heaviest concentration of foreign applicants.
|
|