[求助]文艺复兴女性那题

coolzbq

就是寡妇那个 好像挺多朋友考到

想问下:就是最后一题是不是一定选E来着

    Historians who study European

       women of the Renaissance try to mea-

       sure “independence,” “options,” and

Line       other indicators of the degree to which

  (5)      the expression of women’s individuality

was either permitted or suppressed.

Influenced by Western individualism,

these historians define a peculiar form

of personhood:  an innately bounded

 (10)      unit, autonomous and standing apart

from both nature and society.  An

anthropologist, however, would contend

that a person can be conceived in ways

other than as an “individual.”  In many

 (15)      societies a person’s identity is not

intrinsically unique and self-contained

but instead is defined within a complex

web of social relationships.

      In her study of the fifteenth-century

 (20)      Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a

historian who specializes in European

women of the Renaissance attributes

individual intention and authorship of

       actions to her subject.  This historian

 (25)      assumes that Alessandra had goals

and interests different from those of her

sons, yet
      much of the historian’s own

research reveals that Alessandra

acted primarily as a champion of her

 (30)      sons’ interests, taking their goals as

her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms

more closely to the anthropologist’s

       notion that personal motivation is

embedded in a social context.  Indeed,

 (35)      one could argue that Alessandra did

       not distinguish her personhood from

that of her sons.  In Renaissance

Europe the boundaries of the con-

ceptual self were not always firm

 (40)      and closed and did not necessarily

coincide with the boundaries of

the bodily self.

GWD-3-Q38:

According to the passage, much of the research on Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) supports which of the following conclusions?

1. Alessandra used her position as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons.

2. Alessandra unwillingly sacrificed her own interests in favor of those of her sons.

3. Alessandra’s actions indicate that her motivations and intentions were those of an independent individual.

4. Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action.

5. Alessandra regarded her sons’ goals and interests as her own.

有人说A,看了阅读版的讨论,感觉还不是很明朗,疑惑ing

大家怎么看这题?

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-4 10:33:34编辑过]

cyyp

E

much of the historian’s own

research reveals that Alessandra

acted primarily as a champion of her

 (30)      sons’ interests, taking their goals as

her own. 

research reveals that Alessandra

acted primarily as a champion of her

 (30)      sons’ interests, taking their goals as

her own. 

oldwen

这个我记得是上月JJ啊,怎么会是本月的?给个原始JJ连接好吗

coolzbq

谢谢cyyp的confirm

回应oldwen

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=22&ID=297848&page=1
            

vicole

等下，你看清楚了机经的写作者是怎么说的没？

文艺复兴女性那篇跟GWD不是一样的！！！！！！

JJ原始作者说的，不要光背这篇啊！！！！！