AA105的疑问

寂寞的自由

AA No.105
The following appeared in an editorial from a newspaper serving the town of Saluda.
“ The Saluda Consolidated High school offers over 200 different courses from which its students can choose. A much smaller private school down the street offers a basic curriculum of only 80 different courses, but it consistently sends a higher proportion of its graduating seniors on to college than Consolidated does. By eliminating at least half of the courses offered there and focusing on a basic curriculum, we could improve student performance at Consoidated and also save many tax dollars.”

想问问大家，黑体字部分SAVE MANY TAX DOLLARS这个表达，在原文中存在着什么重要的逻辑错误吗？因为我想到了只是两点错误，如果这个也是一点的话，正好三点错误，谢谢大家

Vanna

我觉的这个题错误不一定非要写save tax, 错误很多，比如可以写：

1.　两个学校的可比性.
2.   basic curriculum 是否为a higher proportion of its graduating seniors 的唯一原因.
3.   评价　student performance 是否通过 higher proportion .

如果要写tax的话，可以说：

tax是通过课程的数量来交，还是学时数,学习的科目，老师的不同，学生的数量？还有其它的条件等...文中似乎不得而知，且会随着改课而变化...所以...太笼统...

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-12-15 8:01:52编辑过]

寂寞的自由

谢谢VANNA的帮助~~~