ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2741|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

28-2-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-10 00:36:00 | 只看该作者

28-2-18

18. Each child in a group of young children read aloud both a short paragraph and a list of randomly ordered words from the paragraph. The more experienced readers among them made fewer pronunciation errors in whichever task they performed second. Whether it was the list or the paragraph. The order in which the two tasks were performed, however, had no effect on the performance of beginning readers, who always made fewer pronunciation errors when reading the paragraph than when reading the list.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the order in which the tasks were performed was not significant for the beginning readers?

(A) Because several words were used more than once in the paragraph but only once in the list, the list, the list was shorter than the paragraph.

(B) In reading the paragraph, the more experienced readers were better at using context to guess at difficult words than were the beginning readers.

(C) The more experienced readers sounded out difficult words, while the beginning readers relied solely on context to guess at difficult words.

(D) Both tasks used the same words, so that the words the children read in whichever task was performed first would be recognized in the second task.

(E) The beginning readers made more pronunciation errors than the more experienced readers did in reading both the paragraph and the list
答案是c
谁能帮我把c翻译一下啊
原文的意思我还可以看懂,可c看不懂,也就不知道里面是什么关系,谢谢了
沙发
发表于 2003-12-10 01:45:00 | 只看该作者
我也选错了,看了答案后分析一下,觉得也有道理.
有经验的孩子试探的读出难词,而没经验的只能通过上下文猜测.所以读段落时,通过上下文猜测可多读对一些.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-10 09:32:00 | 只看该作者
对啊,问题就在这里,为什么有经验的孩子第一次是试探的读出难词,而第二次就可以读对了呢,真是奇怪,道理是第一次读错了第二次也没有道理读对啊
这是为什么啊,再帮我解释一下吧

地板
发表于 2003-12-10 10:58:00 | 只看该作者
番茄,问题问的是,why the order in which the tasks were performed was not significant for the beginning readers? 不是有经验的怎么样.

C解释了这一点呀。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-10 12:31:00 | 只看该作者
我还是没看懂c怎么做了一个合理的解释
bryony再给我说的详细一些吧
6#
发表于 2003-12-10 12:37:00 | 只看该作者
主要看这句话 the beginning readers relied solely on context to guess at difficult words.

所以顺序对他们没影响啦,因为他们完全依赖上下文。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-10 12:40:00 | 只看该作者
你说的这个我可以理解
可是对于experienced readers ,c是怎么解释的呢,它的那个解释我怎么看不懂啊
8#
发表于 2003-12-10 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
嘻嘻,它又没叫你解释有经验的孩子。

我觉得C可以勉强解释。第一遍读出来困难,第二遍读的时候自然好一点咯。逻辑上不太严密,不过经验总是这样的呀。
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-10 15:12:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵,susan也是这样和我说的,谢谢了
10#
发表于 2003-12-10 17:59:00 | 只看该作者
就和我们阅读一样,如果读第2遍,肯定好多了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-23 17:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部