ＧＷＤ７－１２，请教．．．

云的足迹

      Linda Kerber argued in the mid-

       1980’s that after the American Revolution

       (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican

Line       motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-

  (5)      cational opportunities for women in the

United States.  Kerber maintained that

the leaders of the new nation wanted

women to be educated in order to raise

politically virtuous sons.  A virtuous citi-

 (10)      zenry was considered essential to the

success of the country’s republican form

of government; virtue was to be instilled

not only by churches and schools, but

by families, where the mother’s role

 (15)      was crucial.  Thus, according to Kerber,

motherhood became pivotal to the fate

of the republic, providing justification for

an unprecedented attention to female

education.

 (20)            Introduction of the republican moth-

       erhood thesis dramatically changed

       historiography.  Prior to Kerber’s work,

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

 (25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining

newspaper advertisements for acade-

mies, Woody found that educational

opportunities increased for both girls

and boys around 1750.  Pointing to “An

 (30)      Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting

a shift in view, Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

       many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

 (35)
                    that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

      lican motherhood” thesis may have

 (40)     obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

             

1. The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century

2. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution

3. The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution

4. Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century

5. Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

答案选的是Ｂ，我不明白的地方是Ｋ的观点不是支持站后的教育吗，为什么不先Ｃ的ＡＦＴＥＲ呢？请ＮＮ指点一下

kevintown

 

Kerber’s work
                                differs from
                                Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
                                

问题： K的著作和W著作
                            的主要区别是？

并非是K著作主要在说什么！

B答案：
                                对应原文Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates
                                    before the Revolution.
                                    时间正确
                                        

D 同意： 有一个很明确的错误，就是时间范围during the eighteenth century, k的观点是after the American Revolution。
                                    K和W,两人其实都认为在18世纪妇女教育发生了改变，只是革命前后的问题。
                                    

第一句话和最后一句话说明了整个文章围绕的时间是American Revolution，从头到尾都没有提过“整个18世纪”

making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.

Kerber’s work
            differs from
            Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
            

问题： K的著作和W著作
        的主要区别是？

并非是K著作主要在说什么！

B答案：
            对应原文Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates
                before the Revolution.
                时间正确
                    

D 同意： 有一个很明确的错误，就是时间范围during the eighteenth century, k的观点是after the American Revolution。
                K和W,两人其实都认为在18世纪妇女教育发生了改变，只是革命前后的问题。
                

第一句话和最后一句话说明了整个文章围绕的时间是American Revolution，从头到尾都没有提过“整个18世纪”

making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.

amy1028

谢谢你哦KEVIN...讲得详细又认真... 我替发帖者谢谢你了!

nerakuhs

以下是引用kevintown在2008-7-26 11:37:00的发言：

Kerber’s work
        differs from
        Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
        

问题： K的著作和W著作
       的主要区别是？

并非是K著作主要在说什么！

B答案：
        对应原文Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates
         before the Revolution.
         时间正确
          

D 同意： 有一个很明确的错误，就是时间范围during the eighteenth century, k的观点是after the American Revolution。
         K和W,两人其实都认为在18世纪妇女教育发生了改变，只是革命前后的问题。
         

第一句话和最后一句话说明了整个文章围绕的时间是American Revolution，从头到尾都没有提过“整个18世纪”

making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.

Kerber’s work
        differs from
        Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
        

问题： K的著作和W著作
       的主要区别是？

并非是K著作主要在说什么！

B答案：
        对应原文Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates
         before the Revolution.
         时间正确
          

D 同意： 有一个很明确的错误，就是时间范围during the eighteenth century, k的观点是after the American Revolution。
         K和W,两人其实都认为在18世纪妇女教育发生了改变，只是革命前后的问题。
         

第一句话和最后一句话说明了整个文章围绕的时间是American Revolution，从头到尾都没有提过“整个18世纪”

making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.

Kerber’s work
   differs from
   Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
   

问题： K的著作和W著作
  的主要区别是？

并非是K著作主要在说什么！

B答案：
   对应原文Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates
    before the Revolution.
    时间正确
     

D 同意： 有一个很明确的错误，就是时间范围during the eighteenth century, k的观点是after the American Revolution。
    K和W,两人其实都认为在18世纪妇女教育发生了改变，只是革命前后的问题。
    

第一句话和最后一句话说明了整个文章围绕的时间是American Revolution，从头到尾都没有提过“整个18世纪”

making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.

Kerber’s work
   differs from
   Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?  我理解错了。。。以为问K，实际是问W's primarily concerning 是什么

floractc

我也选的C，难道Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following中concerning不是修饰主语Kerber's work么？这就变成了一个语法问题，如果修饰的是Wood's应该用who concerned...

如果我理解错误请指出！

Brilliance

。