以下是引用riverquiet在2007-9-30 11:07:00的发言:没讨论国,我搜索了 . GWD17-Q30: In a study conducted in Pennsylvania, servers in various restaurants wrote “Thank you” on randomly selected bills before presenting the bills to their customers. Tips on these bills were an average of three percentage points higher than tips on bills without the message. Therefore, if servers in Pennsylvania regularly wrote “Thank you” on restaurant bills, their average income from tips would be significantly higher than it otherwise would have been.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
- The “Thank you” messages would have the same impact on regular patrons of a restaurant as they would on occasional patrons of the same restaurant.
- Regularly seeing “Thank you” written on their bills would not lead restaurant patrons to revert to their earlier tipping habits.
- The written “Thank you” reminds restaurant patrons that tips constitute a significant part of the income of many food servers.
- The rate at which people tip food servers in Pennsylvania does not vary with how expensive a restaurant is.
- Virtually all patrons of the Pennsylvania restaurants in the study who were given a bill with “Thank you” written on it left a larger tip than they otherwise would have.
Answer: B 为什么啊,不明白如果他们改掉了以前的小费习惯,受字条影响,那不是给的更多啊 问假设。 原文说:出示账单前贴个感谢导致比不贴多3倍小费。所以贴了比不贴好。 A说感谢针对同样回头客(patron不认识就算了)在同样的饭店,离谱,杀! B题干里面有否定,先不看,留着 C说感谢能让P想起小费怎么怎么样,好歹有点关系,留着 D说小费的比例不论饭店贵贱,没变化,太野马了,干掉 E看到virtually all,心里一紧,问自己假设需要这么强的语气么?想起《大秦帝国》里面那句“望之不似人君”的motto BC开比 C不知道在说什么 B怎么着都像正确答案 差不多得了 B |