ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: jiejie219
打印 上一主题 下一主题

半岛姐妹复习日记

[复制链接]
681#
发表于 2007-11-3 00:44:00 | 只看该作者

论坛有问题啊...为什么一贴要发两遍呢...疯了.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-3 0:49:15编辑过]
682#
发表于 2007-11-3 00:44:00 | 只看该作者

大家来看看这条CR

In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat.  Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees.  Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

 

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

 

  1. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.

  2. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.

  3. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.

  4. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.

  5. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

答案是E

我选A.

文章最后说因为这个游客怎样怎样和HUNTER怎样怎样所以可以PLAN有效.那么A是针对游客说的.所以我选A.

难道我思路错了?A削弱前提所以不对???

 

还有这题:

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland’s cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

 Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland’s cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

 Raoul responds to Sonya’s argument by doing which of the following?

A: Questioning the support for Sonya’s conclusion by distinguishing carefully between No change and no decrease

B: calling Sonya’s conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change.

C: Arguing that Sonya’s conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen.

D: showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect

E: pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the predicts it will have

我选了E,但是答案是B.不太明白.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-3 0:44:59编辑过]
683#
发表于 2007-11-3 02:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用amorela在2007-11-2 23:41:00的发言:
战略上蔑视,战术上重视?????哈哈哈.不知道也.

反了啦!是战略上重视,战术上藐视,心里重视,表面装不在乎,给敌人下马威!【反正白白是心里表面都不重视,考不好活该!】
684#
发表于 2007-11-3 02:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用amorela在2007-11-3 0:44:00的发言:

大家来看看这条CR

In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat.  Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees.  Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

 

  1. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean
                        are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees. 【偶是觉得A是合理的,但是心得告诉我不可以否定原文的“陈述性内容”——我会视为客观不变】

  2. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.

  3. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.

  4. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.

  5. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.【而后面的是我会视为“主观内容”,所以可以否定】

答案是E

我选A.

文章最后说因为这个游客怎样怎样和HUNTER怎样怎样所以可以PLAN有效.那么A是针对游客说的.所以我选A.

难道我思路错了?A削弱前提所以不对???

 

 

还有这题:

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland’s cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

 Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland’s cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

 Raoul responds to Sonya’s argument by doing which of the following?

A: Questioning the support for Sonya’s conclusion by distinguishing carefully between No change and no decrease

B: calling Sonya’s conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change.

C: Arguing that Sonya’s conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen.

D: showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect

E: pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the predicts it will have 【我想这个initiative是包括前者说的整个推论,而后者是部分认同,但是否定最终的结果,就是B中的“effect”吧,所以B更确切】

我选了E,但是答案是B.不太明白.


685#
发表于 2007-11-3 06:10:00 | 只看该作者

偶觉得白白分析的挺好的,额来说一下自己的观点

1,不能否定题目给的客观事实,所以A不对啦 ,E他因削弱了拉。怎样才能不被这种事实性的东东影响呢,熏衣草说的挺对的,就是读完题后用一句话来概括结论,这样就不回,在找无关选项的时候随便扔了

2题,额是从commone sense的角度想的,因为They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland. ,为什么会这样呢,为了逃税,所以.....至于E潜意识里是添加了条件的

686#
发表于 2007-11-3 08:39:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用yoyo88在2007-11-3 0:40:00的发言:

宝儿,

你知道哪份GWD的答案是目前最新的吗?

偶手里有一份,但是个别答案好像有问题。

能告诉我你使用的是哪份吗?谢谢先。

这个是我当时复习写的GWD答案,但是后来冲刺的时候发现其中有几个也有点问题的,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=34&replyid=2559061&id=277562&page=1&skin=0&Star=18

对了,我主要使用TOOTOO版,并且在上面个别答案做了修改

687#
发表于 2007-11-3 08:40:00 | 只看该作者

今晚的飞机,开始打包!!!!

我连键盘都背着去!!!!!!

688#
发表于 2007-11-3 09:03:00 | 只看该作者

喂喂,看哪里,就是说你啦,背着键盘过安检的女娃!

小声问:小猪,你要飞去哪里?考试的地方离家很远吗?你应该没有讲过吧,若是有发过贴,就是白白没有爬文,请告诉白白吧(不想公开可短信),白白姐姐要开始为你敲木鱼啦(本来就无心向学,所以不用担心会浪费我的时间哈)......一切顺利,考个跟宝儿有一拼的好成绩!

689#
发表于 2007-11-3 09:13:00 | 只看该作者

我飞到美国考试啦~~~嘎嘎,去找白白,找洋洋

呵呵,只是去北京

我在一个重度污染的地方上学~~~~~

直接无语言~~~~~~~~~~~~~

690#
发表于 2007-11-3 09:37:00 | 只看该作者

来嘛来嘛,我可以让半张大床给你睡哦!不过白白姐姐好象有点喜欢女生的倾向,所以......

祖国最大污染的省份或城市是哪里?我还真是不晓得耶

小猪加油,你是不是跟洋洋同天考,不管啦,总之一切顺顺当当就好!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-26 18:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部