[紧急]提醒本月JJ的一道错题，顺便问下各位NN们考前的建议

jojolynn

我也是后天,7号

也没有摸考,JJ也没有看完.

不过还是准备明天摸考一下,至少有PACE的感觉.

cakemouse

jj + 一次模考

模考建议跳过数学,直接做VERBAL,主要体会界面,不用在意分数.

dustychen

谢谢各位的建议

祝你们都好运！

YiYaYiYaYou

Believe me, I asked 2 English PhD students and an Instructor about this question at the ESL center, Choose C.    More sample, more convincing.

ElleYu

I don't agree with C, since it only repeats the premise of the argument.  But B doesn't seem make related to the conculsion in any way. The passage talks about follow-up x-rays on ankle injury envolving fracture are wasting money, but it does not discuss the injured anckles not envolving fracture...

dennyhuang

orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

B.      Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.

C.      X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

我觉得BC都有道理  原题rthopedists担心错误诊断了stability of the fracture,当看过大量的二次x光复查后发现所有开始诊断stable的都愈合了(开始stable有可能就是没骨折),所以,开始诊断是stable的做二次x光复查是一种浪费.

B很多第一次做x光的ankle创伤都显示不是骨折

C不同的orth的病人的x光片被复查(第一次x片被(可能是两人)review stable,就说明再做一次x片的意义不大)

不过我第一眼看这题时倾向B,看了很多人选c后,我琢磨一下觉得c也有道理.

babycake

这道题，逻辑的大大NN lawyer_1有过阐述。我觉得他讲的肯定是对的，因为经过其他无数大大NN的验证。C就说明“样本具有代表性”,所以是支持。

dennyhuang

以下是引用babycake在2007-9-6 12:41:00的发言：
这道题，逻辑的大大NN lawyer_1有过阐述。我觉得他讲的肯定是对的，因为经过其他无数大大NN的验证。C就说明“样本具有代表性”,所以是支持。

有吗?mm能不能给个连接

谢谢

babycake

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=80228

yjwright

orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

B.      Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.

C.      X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

这题越看越有意思. 把我的想法跟大家分享一下:

B: 我觉得可以理解为: X-Ray was ordered for many ankle injuries. (Later, ) X-Ray revealed that there was no fracture of the ankle.

如果这种理解是正确的(请战友们鉴定), 那么第一个X-Ray说得是initial, 第二个就是review X-Ray了. 也就是说review X-ray没发现骨折, 也就是都好了?