ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2563|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 1essay 12错了5次

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-20 15:23:00 | 只看该作者

prep 1essay 12错了5次

The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians.  The disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period has elements of irony to it.  On the one hand, in writing about women, earlier historians had relied not on firsthand sources but rather on secondary sources; the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded.  On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant:  historians saw political history as the general framework for historical writing.  Because women were seen as belonging to the private rather than to the public sphere, the discovery of documents about them, or by them, did not, by itself, produce history acknowledging the contributions of women. In addition, genres such as biography and memoir, those forms of "particular history" that women had traditionally authored, fell into disrepute.  The dividing line between "particular history" and general history was redefined in stronger terms, widening the gulf between amateur and professional practices of historical research.

 

 

Question #41.  270-02  (23168-!-item-!-188;#058&000270-02)

 

 

Which of the following best describes one of the "elements of irony" referred to in the highlighted text?

 

 

(A) Although the more scientific-minded historians of the second half of the nineteenth century considered women appropriate subjects for historical writing, earlier historians did not.

(B) Although archival research uncovered documentary evidence of women's role in history, historians continued to rely on secondary sources for information about women.

(C) Although historians were primarily concerned with writing about the public sphere, they generally relegated women to the private sphere.

(D) The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored.

(E) The professionalization of history, while marginalizing much of women's writing about history, enhanced the importance of women as historical subjects.

答案是D但是文章只是说一是用的是二手资料,二是正确不相关,没有看到说information was ignored,my answer is B,为什么呢

 

Many people believe that because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries.  Currently, developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages.  Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers.  When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise.  Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low.  However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages.  Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country.  And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely.

Question #57.  549-06  (23940-!-item-!-188;#058&000549-06)

 

The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?

 

(A) Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.

(B) Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.

(C) A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.

(D) A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.

(E) Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.

答案是D不知道为什么

Question #57.  549-06  (23940-!-item-!-188;#058&000549-06)

 

The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?

 

(A) Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.

(B) Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.

(C) A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.

(D) A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.

(E) Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.

答案是D不知道为什么


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-20 16:35:36编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-8-24 02:34:00 | 只看该作者

我也迷惑着,这文章看着不难,可是怎么文章的逻辑关系却搞不清楚呢,到底重点是什么?

板凳
发表于 2007-8-25 10:16:00 | 只看该作者

ding

地板
发表于 2007-8-25 16:19:00 | 只看该作者

 Q41:

D

On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant  说的就是这句阿

the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded 这句话已经否定B了

5#
发表于 2010-9-27 15:19:24 | 只看该作者
On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant

求NN们翻译一下。 这个和D) The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored. 有什么关系?

原文翻译,我个人认为大概是这样,在一方面文档文书的增多开始展现关于女性的新的历史证据,但是这些证据无关。

选项的翻译:历史研究的科学方法提供了更多关于女性的信息,但是这些信息被忽略了。

请教大家,这个翻译有什么不妥.

be still confusing!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 22:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部