l两道argument的疑问，急盼赐教！

SuJie0481010

　

　78. 地方报纸的编者按：

The city should be able to improve existing sevices and provide new ones without periodically raising the taxes of the residents.Instead, the city should require that the costs of sevices be paid for by developers who seek approval for their largenew building projects. After all, these projects can be highly profitalbe to the developers, but they can also raise a city's expenses and increase the demand for its sevices.

这个城市应该不必周期性地提高居民税收就能提高现有的服务，提供新的服务。相反，城市应该要求为大型新建筑项目申请许可的发展商支付服务的成本。毕竟这些项目给发展商带来的利润是很高的，但是他们也可能提高城市消费并增加对服务的需求。

我无法理解最后一句话，＂但是他们也可能提高城市消费并增加对服务的需求＂，是什么意思啊，应该怎么攻击？

还有一题，

Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wagesopaid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer:they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

80. 商业杂志的编者按：

　　大多数公司都同意如果工作时受伤的概率增加，付给雇员的工资就也应该增加。因此对雇主来说让工作场所更安全有会带来经济利益。这样他们就可以节省工资开支进而省钱。

孙远上是这样攻击其中一点的：the arguer fails to consider other factors that result in increase in the wages paid to employees.

我怎么觉得牛头不对马嘴啊，大公司同意这一点，但并没有否定其他增加工资的因素啊？

　78. 地方报纸的编者按：

The city should be able to improve existing sevices and provide new ones without periodically raising the taxes of the residents.Instead, the city should require that the costs of sevices be paid for by developers who seek approval for their largenew building projects. After all, these projects can be highly profitalbe to the developers, but they can also raise a city's expenses and increase the demand for its sevices.

这个城市应该不必周期性地提高居民税收就能提高现有的服务，提供新的服务。相反，城市应该要求为大型新建筑项目申请许可的发展商支付服务的成本。毕竟这些项目给发展商带来的利润是很高的，但是他们也可能提高城市消费并增加对服务的需求。

我无法理解最后一句话，＂但是他们也可能提高城市消费并增加对服务的需求＂，是什么意思啊，应该怎么攻击？

还有一题，

Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wagesopaid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer:they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

80. 商业杂志的编者按：

　　大多数公司都同意如果工作时受伤的概率增加，付给雇员的工资就也应该增加。因此对雇主来说让工作场所更安全有会带来经济利益。这样他们就可以节省工资开支进而省钱。

孙远上是这样攻击其中一点的：the arguer fails to consider other factors that result in increase in the wages paid to employees.

我怎么觉得牛头不对马嘴啊，大公司同意这一点，但并没有否定其他增加工资的因素啊？

rio

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=26&ID=255664&page=1

先参考一下