ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5069|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD18-4,5的答案是不是错了?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-27 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

GWD18-4,5的答案是不是错了?

搜了只有一个讨论贴,而且一致认为答案不对?偶选的和他们也一样的诶...有同感的吗?

The idea that equipping homes

       with electrical appliances and other

       “modern” household technologies

Line       would eliminate drudgery, save labor

  (5)      time, and increase leisure for women

who were full-time home workers

remained largely unchallenged until

the women’s movement of the 1970’s

spawned the groundbreaking and

 (10)      influential works of sociologist Joann

Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.

Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-

use surveys conducted by home

economists to argue that electrical

 (15)      appliances and other modern house-

hold technologies reduced the effort

required to perform specific tasks,

but ownership of these appliances did

not correlate with less time spent on

 (20)      housework by full-time home workers.

       In fact, time spent by these workers

       remained remarkably constant―at

about 52 to 54 hours per week―from

the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period

 (25)      of significant change in household

technology.  In surveying two

centuries of household technology

in the United States, Cowan argued

that the “industrialization” of the home

 (30)      often resulted in more work for full-time

home workers because the use of

such devices as coal stoves, water

       pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended

to reduce the workload of married-

 (35)     women’s helpers (husbands, sons,

daughters, and servants) while

promoting a more rigorous standard

of housework.  The full-time home

worker’s duties also shifted to include

 (40)      more household management, child

care, and the post-Second World War

phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”

Q4:

The passage is primarily concerned with

             

  1. analyzing a debate between two scholars
  2. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
  3. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view
  4. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
  5. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 21-26 (“In fact, time … in household technology”)?

             

  1. It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20).
  2. It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20) is based.
  3. It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.
  4. It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.
  5. It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.

我的答案是C,B

给的答案是A,C

沙发
发表于 2007-8-1 07:58:00 | 只看该作者
我的答案跟你一样。。。
板凳
发表于 2007-8-1 08:00:00 | 只看该作者
刚刚看到另外一篇帖子,好像所有人的答案都是CB
地板
发表于 2007-8-21 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

那到底是什么啊,我也是选CB啊

我搜索不到以前的讨论稿阿,在汇总里也没有啊,有哪位能帮忙提供一下链接吗?

5#
发表于 2007-8-22 12:23:00 | 只看该作者
是C,B。excel文件里的答案写错了。在WORD版详细解释里面,答案是CB的。
6#
发表于 2007-8-24 12:26:00 | 只看该作者

支持CB

剛做完一檢討還以為自己眼睛花了

這篇文章簡單

怎麼連錯兩題

7#
发表于 2007-10-14 11:30:00 | 只看该作者

奇怪,为什么这道题目以前没人讨论过么?大家都有疑问阿

8#
发表于 2007-11-10 18:24:00 | 只看该作者
支持CB
9#
发表于 2007-11-29 15:58:00 | 只看该作者
UP
10#
发表于 2007-12-6 18:26:00 | 只看该作者

C  B

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-23 08:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部