以下是引用terry_tin在2003-5-20 17:51:00的发言: 最难的逻辑题往往就是考阅读能力,然而我个人认为逻辑题本身有它的特殊性,阅读题你没读懂一般猜不出答案,但是逻辑题,往往不需要读懂那么多的元素,只要掌握几个基本的冬冬就可以成功的做题。 以这道题为例, many geologists theorize that the trail of volcanic craters and cinder cones along the snake river plain of southern idaho was produced as the north american continent slid westward over a stationary “plume”, a vertical channel through which molten rock rose intermittently from the earth’s core to burst through its curst.
which of the following, if true, tends to support the geologists’ theory of how the trail was produced?
(a) the largest craters and cinder cones are on the eastern margin of the trail. (b) the most violent volcanic activity apparently occurred at the western margin of the trail. (c) the craters and cinder cones are evenly spaced throughout the extent of the trail. (d) the newest craters and cinder cones are on the eastern margin of the trail. (e) the craters and cinder cones on the western margin of the trail generally took longer to form than did those on the eastern margin. 对于解题而言,这么长的句子只需要知道这么几个知识点: 1. direction: nothern--westward, upward 2. what: volcanic craters and cinder cones along the snake river C完全和题目没有任何关系,没有提到任何方向的问题。 A.B.E的内容题中没有涉及 只有D是正确的,这样的话,解题的时间不会超过一分钟。 以上是我的一点看法,希望对大家有益
有道理,有道理。看来牛牛们的共同点还是蛮多的。
我的问题是,在做完题目之前,如何判定读哪一部分、搞清楚哪几个知识点。除了感觉和直觉以外,有没有其他有规律性的东西可以依靠。
最近总结LSAT,也发现了同样的情况。四五行的句子,对答案真正有贡献的,可能就是4 5个词,其他都是铺垫。可是在找出答案之前,怎样才能敏锐地捉住这几个关键词呢?
如果真能抓住这几个关键词,我相信,速度的确不成问题。即:掌握了方法的人,想慢都漫不下来,因为确实无事可做。
问题就是,怎样,在做题之前,拎出这些知识点。
谢谢! |