ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: mypiao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-7-31 (NN help me)

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2013-7-24 04:26:05 | 只看该作者
do not question officially correct answers!
far too many students on this forum make the mistake of questioning the correct answers; please note that doing so is a complete waste of your time and effort. i.e., exactly 0% of the time that you spend posting "isn't this official answer wrong?" is productive, and exactly 100% of that time is wasted.

"is this correct?" is NEVER a productive question to ask about one of GMAC's correct answers -- the answer is always yes.
"is this wrong?" / "is this X type of error?" is NEVER a productive question to ask about one of GMAC's correct answers -- the answer is always no.

instead, the questions you should be asking about correct official answers, if you don't understand them, are:
"why is this correct?"
"how does this work?"
"what understanding am i lacking that i need to understand this choice?"

this is a small, but hugely significant, change to your way of thinking -- you will suddenly find it much easier to understand the format, style, and conventions of the official problems if you dispose of the idea that they might be wrong.
22#
发表于 2013-7-24 04:27:08 | 只看该作者
上面转子manhattan论坛!
23#
发表于 2013-8-16 08:07:25 | 只看该作者
mypiao 发表于 2007-6-13 15:59
谢谢,我知道D的意思啊,encourage guests to "touch" ..and (to)active....但这样是不符合逻辑的,显然是en ...

牛牛的逻辑没有问题,并且Official Answer就这么写的啊完全表达你想说的所有意思了

你很清楚的说明了整个project后面的原理,“显然是encourage guests to "touch"这个事情的结果active了后面的一串东西,而不是guest本身active了那后面的一串.前面的touch导致了后面的active” OA里的thereby这一个词已经包括了你想说的所有意思。

theryby说明了一种因果关系,表示activate是前面整个句子的结果,而不是只是单一的和touch平行的关系,不然thereby也没有出现的必要。






24#
发表于 2013-8-16 08:39:11 | 只看该作者
转载个manhattan很好的解释

The OG says there is no antecedent for "which" because the only thing the "which" can logically refer to is the act of touching, which cannot work because it is not a noun..
25#
发表于 2013-9-15 20:07:39 | 只看该作者
S7S7讲的非常好,支持
26#
发表于 2014-8-5 03:56:20 | 只看该作者
顶啊 楼主的问题也是我想问的!!一开始我就选B了,因为逻辑上是前面visitors touch的动作导致activate麽,怎么主语能是一个呢?逻辑上主语是前面那个动作啊!有人觉得activate和touch的主语虽都是人,但是有个thereby在中间就可以。。。不明白
27#
发表于 2014-9-20 17:25:01 | 只看该作者
我觉得这题大家忽略了一个语法点,这里的thereby 有点 only/first的意思,逻辑意思上是不能去掉的,那么A和D选D
28#
发表于 2016-11-4 17:32:21 | 只看该作者
xunzlyx 发表于 2013-8-16 08:07
牛牛的逻辑没有问题,并且Official Answer就这么写的啊完全表达你想说的所有意思了

你很清楚的说明了整个 ...

xunzlyx解释了lz的疑惑,lz强调visitor不是activate的主语是对的,但没有关注thereby,B的语义恰恰是不完整的
29#
发表于 2016-12-20 12:08:34 | 只看该作者
mypiao 发表于 2007-6-13 15:07
不好意思,新开了一贴,因为想被NN批判.    Q31:    Unlike the or ...

同意!               
30#
发表于 2016-12-20 12:11:39 | 只看该作者
mypiao 发表于 2007-6-13 18:27
首先谢谢s7s7,当然了高手应该平和才是还想请教下一点疑问:如果主语是 he Virtual Leonardo Project,那么它 ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 15:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部