以下是引用seamoon8在2007-6-3 10:50:00的发言:DISHONESTY KILLS RELIABILITY
There are certain considerations of factors that everyone takes into account in a relationship. 
eople may look for honesty, altruism, understanding, loyalty, being thoughtful etc! Everyone would more or less wish that the person s/he is dealig with, has some of these virtues above. Putting them in an order according to their importancd, however can be very subjective and relative.
When someone asks hime/herself the question"What do I consider to be the most important thing in my relationship?"the answer depends on a lot of factors such as how his/her earlier relationships were.
After stating that everyone's opinion can be diffirent about this, for me honesty, in other words, always telling the truth is the most important consideration in a relationship. Opposite of this is inarguably lying and if someone needs to lie, either s/he is hiding something or is afraid of telling me something.
In any relationship of mine, I would wish that first of all, the person I'm dealing with is honest. Even thouth s/he thinks that s/she did something wrong that I wouldn't like, s/he'd better tell me the truth and not liie about it. Later on if I find out about a lie or hear the truth from someone else, that'd be much more unpleasant. In that case how can I ever believe or trust that person again? How can I ever believe that this person has enough confidence in me to forgive him/her and carry on with the relationship from there. So if I cannot trust a person anyone, if the person doesn't think I can handle the truth, there's no point for continuing that relationship.
Although I would like to see altruistic, understanding, thoughtful and loyal behavior from people, an instance of the opposite of these behaviors would not upset me as much as dishonety would. Among all the possible behaviors, dishonesty is the only one for me that terminates how O feel about a person's reliability. Therefore honesty would be my first concern and the most important consideration in a relationship.
Score 5 :Annotation
In this response the writer first approaches the topic by underscoring that one could consider a number of character traits as being important to a relationship. The writer then effectively develops an agrument that it is dishonesty of unwillingness to fjlly disclose some bad action that, unlike other negative behaviors, cannot be forgiven and is the most important factor in destroying a relationship. Language used here is fluent, accurate, and varied enough to effectively carry the writer's progression and connection of ideas.
第一句,这个作文作者首先通过强调在一个关系中一个人可能考虑许多的性格特征,通过这个来处理话题,主题.
不明白,这个怎么就处理话题了???
我认为,这个意思是找了一个合适的切入点把自己的话题和题目联系起来。而不是像大多数人那样:I agree/disagree...
第二句,作者然后有效地发展了论点,这个论点是:不像其它的负面行为,不诚实或者是不情愿全面揭露一些坏的行为是不可能被原谅的,并且是毁坏一种关系的最重要的因素.
没看出来是怎么有效地发展了论点,偶只知道文章第四段在论证,论证的逻辑顺序偶也看不出来,不知道这个有效体现到哪里去了.??
作者的发展主要体现在把诚实和信任结合在了一起,换句话说,把一个大的话题缩小了范围。这样观点就比较鲜明。
第三句, 这儿使用的语言,流利,精确,其且多样化,足够能有效地carry 作者的progression(译不出来?啥意思呢?)和思想的连接.
语言流利,这篇文章体现在哪里呢,多样化又在哪里呢,在原文中找不到啊,这个思想的连接指的是连接词吗???
progression就是逻辑思路的延伸:比如after stating ... Even though... ALthough这些在文中都有明显的使用。且表达意思准确。语言多样性没发现。流利倒是流利。
这个文章到底好在哪里呢,下面是偶看原文时的问题,原文一共有五段
第一段,每个人考虑一个关系中考虑多种因素,有什么,什么,等等,要把这些关系按照重要排一排
这种写作的开头是在做什么呢,还写的挺多的,虽然不算是跑题吧,可是跟论证的关系在哪里呢???
其实T的写作话题是个很宽泛的,要靠自己去narrow,这种写法就是这样的目的。
第二段当有人被问哪个因素更重要的时候,回答依赖于许多因素例如早期关系怎么样
偶怎么不明白为什么要写这段话,第一段不是已经写了吗,这里怎么又写了,逻辑啥是为了说明什么呢????
我也不明白
第三段 对我而言说真话最重要.Opposite of this is inarguably lying and if someone needs to lie, either s/he is hiding something or is afraid of telling me something.
第二句写的这个算是论证吗?是反过来说一下???不懂这句话在写作里算不算论证.????
这是一种常用的论证方法,为了说明A的好处,就说没有A的坏处。
第四段 完全弄不懂这个作文论证的逻辑主线是什么,就觉得一堆话在反复说,是怎么回事呢????
同感。
第五段 虽然我也喜欢其它一堆好性格,但是这些好性格的反面不会让我像不诚实一样沮丧.在所有行为里面,不诚实是唯一偶感觉一个人可靠性的终点,所以诚实在一个关系里是偶的最首要关心和最主要的考虑.
最后一段这样说反过的的性格偶是什么态度是不是呼应前面的第三段的第二句呢,像第三段的第二句话那样反过来说也能叫论证???
这一段是在总结,所以重复的比较多