40: GWD-29-Q29

东西方隐

C 有两个errors

1. previously adv. 不能修饰 noun.

2. compared 修饰歧义.

redamat

以下是引用风儿929在2007-5-11 22:30:00的发言：

个人感觉:

compared to...这个插入将toward...与前句隔得太远,非常不顺畅.如果是:

......to contribute $330 a
   year toward the cost of higher education, compared to the previously $7 per year.

就可以.

我覺得這裡最主要的錯誤是previously錯誤修飾成compared。

此外，我覺得B選項沒有錯阿，...to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year.

for which正確地以非限定修飾所有的"higher education" was paid $7 per year.請指教！

jianglan_7

以下是引用redamat在2008-5-6 13:25:00的发言：

我覺得這裡最主要的錯誤是previously錯誤修飾成compared。

此外，我覺得B選項沒有錯阿，...to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year.

for which正確地以非限定修飾所有的"higher education" was paid $7 per year.請指教！

for which后面的从句缺少了主语成分。可参考大全142,大全204

不过我当时也选了B.....

connie4895

请问(A)是因为伴随状语修饰的对象可以是主句也可是that从句产生岐义而删除的吗??

请问(E)要怎么删除，我查字典 contribute something to/toward/for something 都是可以的用法，请NN指点。

jiadingnew

我认为答案应该是E，as opposed to something = in comparison with something。起码美国这边口语里经常用。

deadpig1987

以下是引用jianglan_7在2008-6-11 15:17:00的发言：

for which后面的从句缺少了主语成分。可参考大全142,大全204

不过我当时也选了B.....

B选项的for which后面的从句并没有缺少主语成分呀       for which was previously paid $7 per year 是个倒装  正常的结构就是 $7 per year was previously paid for which 

deadpig1987

以下是引用connie4895在2008-8-27 15:19:00的发言：

请问(A)是因为伴随状语修饰的对象可以是主句也可是that从句产生岐义而删除的吗??

请问(E)要怎么删除，我查字典 contribute something to/toward/for something 都是可以的用法，请NN指点。

(a)中的  previously paying 不可以作伴随状语，伴随状语是要2个动作同时发生，这里已经说了previously了

（e）我个人觉得as opposed to 不太好，$330 per year 和$7 per year 都是数据 数据只有大小的比较 没有正反的比较  而且 repuired for the cost of sth 罗嗦了  直接 required for sth就可以了

deadpig1987

这道题我选B 

D读起来总觉得怪怪的，原句意思也有改变

但是不知道倒装在这种情况下可不可以用

请问到底哪些情况可以用倒装呢？？？

fuwanini

D不对，应该用compared with

compared to指的是把什么比作什么，而compared with指同类事物作比较

flyuo2006

跟deadpig1987一样,B为什么不对呢?