请教一道jj的题目

wudan94

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-heigh tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to beleive that it is likely that

A. some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit all the tall tables if they were available
B. the prices of meals of ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
C. a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
D. a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
E. with enough tall table to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of othe tables
答案是D吗？

mypiao

抛砖引玉........个人觉得答案是E

因为我觉得题干中有to criticism on the grounds 这个限制,不同于if true,所以D不正确,因为从题目中推不出时间短的人一定点便宜的东西吃.

而E的结论就严重削弱了题目的结论.如果很多人都坐在那种高椅子上,最后的结果就是大家大眼瞪小眼,普通人看普通人,反而看不到想看的名人了.结果只能事于愿为.所以选E

wudan94

我也是徘徊在D和E之间，因为D和增加的利润会有关系，而E没有直接谈到利润。

shiguang

E