ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: nina_nn
打印 上一主题 下一主题

费费 38

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-29 18:17:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵~~有结果了,谢谢大家

12#
发表于 2008-9-17 17:52:00 | 只看该作者

我是选a的,但是答案是选d

我觉得d排除他因,应该是支持啊

13#
发表于 2008-11-13 05:59:00 | 只看该作者
???
14#
发表于 2009-9-16 19:05:00 | 只看该作者
ding
15#
发表于 2012-4-5 19:18:18 | 只看该作者
Before trying to answer the question, locate the conclusion first. The conclusion is that "ozone layer depletion" is the primary cause of A population's decrease. More UV-B penetration plays a role here. But it's not saying more UV-B penetration is the primary cause of population decrease.
So A is obviously not a "strengthen". If more kinds of radiation could be harmful, ozone layer plays a more important role. If only one kind, as A said, we can say ozone layer protection is relatively not that important. So A could be regarded as a "weaken" or can just be marked as "irrelevant". So, choose A.
For D, it exclude a possibility that something other than "ozone layer depletion" causes A population to decrease. So it strengthens the argument.
-- by 会员 kenshin (2007/3/28 23:26:00)


谢谢kenshin~~~
恍然大悟啊!!!
看来抓住结论,吃透结论真的很重要!!!

PS:这道题很诡异,也很经典!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 00:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部