以下是引用robinst在2007-3-23 9:47:00的发言: i speculate because many in round 1 declined Wharton to HBS or Stanford(in the China pool), Wharton figured out this way to test applicants' loyalty. Those hv other choices, will choose to remove from waitlist...thus their yield rate can be protected. Remember to discuss this topic with you that W is competing intensively with H&S. According to such assumption and these W/L are capable to get other offers, i try to explain in following way: Applicants are likely overlapped within this small pool. For Chinese, it is special when somebody got H/W/S, he/she will probably go H/S, perhaps especially R1 for this year. The critical issue is that the trend is too obvious to be caught. If I were Adcom of W facing Chinese applicants, I would take "strategy" like this time. In May, if the student is still available for W, it means that W could handle everything rather than vice versa: let he or she in or refuse, in no case applicants will drop W for H/S. Even the student is offered by H/S, W would not lose, because he definitely would not go W. Summary the results, after such “Strategy” is taken: 1. W have choice to offer a guy who can not drop 2. H/S offer a guy who is waitlisted by W--- W has superior criterion to H/S. Thus, W is better than H/S Before that:: A guy drop offer by W for H/S---S and H are better than W in Chinese View In addition, H/S can be replaced by any other school that competes with W Personal assumptions, waiting for correction!
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-23 14:25:56编辑过] |