HKUST VS OXFORD

newboyss

I am fully responsible for my comments. People who know business school better will agree with me.

mohamoha

thanks for your sharing!

modern

我比較想了解newboyss對於" good business school"的定義

列出attributes之後

是用Lexicographic model

還是conjunctive or disconjunctive

去評價呢? 

另外  以單一accounting dep的A+期刊論文數  引用數等  純objective指標去判定  會不會失准呢?  即便是加上其他不同department的A+期刊論文數作為 benchmark之一  這樣就ok了嘛

是否要考量subjective benchmarks?  例如學生反應  ?  或是更多

其他的objective benchmarks呢?

正如很多學生去之前心中的疑問

MBA學生需要的是什麼  難道是學術排名？ 是教授的出版數字？ 

A+論文數目

對於學生進步程度的co-relation是多少?

對於學生找好工作的co-relation又是多少? 
對於學生對學校的向心力  對MBA program滿意程度 的corelation 又是多少?

我們得好好想出這其中的奧妙  您說是嗎

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-14 1:59:00编辑过]

nnm

以下是引用newboyss在2007-3-13 23:39:00的发言：
I am fully responsible for my comments. People who know business school better will agree with me.

Seems like you got plenty of time to spend.

Check this thread, you'll know what they say about Oxford

http://forums.businessweek.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=bw-bschools&tid=58887

newboyss

In the future, Oxford may improve but it is hard. I know about the European mindset. Their system is a bit like Qinghua/Beida and it is going to take a very long time. Right now it is rubbish.

gracis

Newboyss谈了更多商学院Ph.D的东东。

 

HKUST应该是亚洲最好的商学院，师资也是一流的,但是由于地理因素和学校建校时间限制，UST还没有在世界上建立起自己的声誉，故而也很难招收到符合自己水平的生源,其PH.D项目的生源还不是很好，竞争不过北美很多学校，其Placement基本还是局限在亚太地区，毕业之后如果要到美国去教书比较困难(记得IS去了一个University of Neveda, Las Vegas)。Ph.D Placement方面，HKUST应该还不及西班牙的UPF（记得有去Duke，SUNY at Stony Brook, Texas A&M, Rochester, LSE).

newboyss

PhD is hard. But HKUST graduates can find jobs in top asian business schools which are not necessarily worse than US schools. nowadays, HKUST, Singapore managment University, CKGSB, CEIBS pay world wide competitive salaris. There is hope.