一道我连题目都没怎么读懂的逻辑题，高手指导！

jameswei0605

Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

1. Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
2. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.
3. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
4. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
5. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

答案选B

xt142

在刚开业的Spendless折扣百货公司的竞争下，Goreville中心购物区的折扣店预计将在五年内关门，但这些折扣店所在的地皮并不会闲置。五年后随着Colson的开张，这家新的非折扣百货商店将会在这些倒闭商店的地皮上出现，原因就是这些折扣店无法与Colson竞争。

A、在Spendless开业后，很多客户将会更少到Colson购物。

B、Colson开业后，在中心购物区有越来越多的折扣店开业。

C、目前，中心购物区的店铺数并不比以往少。

D、根据下一个五年计划，可以预计Goreville的的人口增长率将比过去几十年高。

E、中心购物区的很多店铺卖的产品是Spendless和Colson都没有的。

只有B选项是有关Colson和折扣店的关系，所以选B

jameswei0605

谢谢！！清楚了！！

luoluocarol

qiang