ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2310|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑885--T16--第2题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-30 19:39:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑885--T16--第2题

The reason much refrigerated food spoils is that it ends up out of sight at the back of the shelf. So why not have round shelves that rotate? Because such rotating shelves would have just the same sort of drawback, since things would fall off the shelves’ edges into the rear corners.
Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against introducing rotating shelves?
(A) Refrigerators would not be made so that their interior space is cylindrical.
(B) Refrigerators would not be made to have a window in front for easy viewing of their contents without opening the door.
(C) The problem of spoilage of refrigerated food is not amenable to any solution based on design changes.
(D) Refrigerators are so well designed that there are bound to be drawbacks to any design change.
(E) Rotating shelves would be designed to rotate only while the refrigerator door was open.

      这道题目我实在想不通,哪位高手指点分析一下
沙发
发表于 2003-10-31 17:14:00 | 只看该作者
The answer should be A

The argument against rotating shelves rulls out the suspicion of things falling off into the rear. How ever, if the interior space of refrigerator could be designed to cylinder just as the contrary to what A states, there will be no rear corner for falling off.  So A is a presupposition.

b, even you get a window to look through without opening the door, you may still find things falling off if the interior has empty corner.

c, d  if true, could make this argument no sense.

e, the statement does not give info. whether the door is open when rotate. Nevertheless, even as the scene E emphasised, chance is that you get things falling off after you open the door if there is rear corner inside.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-25 08:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部