[求助]GWD-24-8

maomm

re~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

maomm

I also wrongly choose A when i mocked test GWD10. However, in A, the past tense "increased" is not compatible with "are evident".

Also, "it" is unnecessary, since the subject of "after" is the same as that in "which have increased".

OPEN TO BE DISCUSSED

rockmax

GWD-24-8

The results of the company’s cost- cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.

 

A.      which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell

B.      which had increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it had fallen

C.      which have increased five percent during the first three months of this year after falling

are evident ---  have increased 应该是这样吧,  但是不懂falling 作什么成分,  怎么解释falling?

a336000

confused..

岳如初

谢谢rio！！ 顿悟~~

gg137

不懂falling 作什么成分,  怎么解释falling?

after doing sth 到底做什么结构？

OG11 上也有类似题 AFTER DOING被放句首的题目 解释里只说了介词能引导分词 所以对的

但我还是不懂 这是做状语还是什么？

wellner

learning

hairicanye

我觉得这里可以这样看 也是刚刚看到大家的想法顿悟的

如果将DE中的with结构看做独立主格，则独立主格由于是起状语的作用，修饰主句的谓语动词，因而其逻辑主语应当是主句主语，即这里的result，这样显然同句子的逻辑意思相左，因而排除

如果就向cold2100所见（我也这样认为），with后面跟的只是一个介词结构，就诚然可以同OG212题（原题cold2100那一层已经列出）相比较，有修饰主语的嫌疑，而不是如原文含义修饰profite；同时，我们可以看到，这里的with后面不仅跟的是a five percent increase，更包含了一长串的修饰结构，我想这样是不符合OG的“precise和concise”原则的

至于which，由于本人不是牛牛，至今也只觉得which最常出的考点就是修饰先行词是否符合逻辑意思的问题，因而就不多加评述了

open to discuss

瞳ヒトミ

with有逗号隔开的时候，好像句子主语是with的逻辑主语，所以这题只能选witch了~

好像有蛮多题目不能选with的原因就是逻辑主语不对

我本来选的是A，后来想想IT指代错了，对于C的after falling有点迷茫~~~

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-8 9:44:43编辑过]

天冥翼

看到大家讨论falling的作用，我觉得是现在分词表状态吧，同时其他的选项有比较明显的漏洞

排除法，it不能指代profits，排除AB

which比with好，排除DE （请参考cold2100第一页的回复）

所以只有C