以下是引用fair_sword在2004-6-8 9:22:00的发言：
While both of these definitions are useful, neither fully captures the dynamic and changing aspects of ethnicity in the United States. Rather, ethnicity is more satisfactorily conceived of as a process in which preexisting communal bonds and common cultural attributes are adapted for instrumental purposes according to changing real-life situations.
One example of this process is the rise of participation by Native American people in the broader United States political system since the Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s. Besides leading Native Americans to participate more actively in politics (the number of Native American legislative officeholders more than doubled), this movement also evoked increased interest in tribal history and traditional culture. Cultural and instrumental components of ethnicity are not mutually exclusive, but rather reinforce one another.
谁能告诉我为什么 instrumental purposes 和instrumental componets of ethnicity 可以来指political activity
从OG对220正确选项的解释, 似乎并不可以看出instrumental purposes就是指political activity.
OG解释道: The reference to Native American people provides a specific example, in terms of political activity, of that process.
只不过举了一个real-life situations的一个例子, 这个例子是Civial Rights运动鼓励了Native American参政(participation in politics system), 而这样的participation反过来又"in turn increased interest in Native American history and culture".
B选项似乎总结了例子后半部分的作用, 而未如第二段开头one example of this process...所述那样是支持process的.
请XDJM指正. | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-7-29 23:40:00
