ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教两道OG逻辑og-103,og-123

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-10-29 09:52:00 | 只看该作者

还有B的取非,是取在DOES还是IS上呢。。。我开始选了B

12#
发表于 2005-11-7 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用snowjing在2005-7-30 5:55:00的发言:

对了,忘了问有些是NN的参与贴,用ID搜索不出来的吧?


应该排除这种可能性.


可以搜索出来,比如本贴2楼的mindfree的回复,点击上面挨着"邮箱"/"引用"的"搜索"按钮即可.

13#
发表于 2006-7-22 23:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mindfree在2003-10-29 6:59:00的发言:
1. First you need to understand the argument and its reasoning. Assumption is to fill the "gap" between premises and conclusions. So the meaning of the assumption must be relevant to the argument. To test assumption, use negative and see if original argument still holds or not.

A. Irrelevant. The argument is not about whether the market can expand or not. And cheap and high-performance are not mentioned. Use A negative you can see original argument does not change.
B. Irrelevant. It does not fit in the argument at all.
C. Right. The gap in the original argument is that the premises said that innovation is driven by racers and conclusion is that innovation is limited to just a certain type. There is a gap between "racer" and certain innovations. Let me use an analogy:

Computer software sales are driven by teens. So software development is limited to games. The gap is between teens and game. The argument by default associate one with the other, in another word, by assumption.

C is just the statement of the association.
D. Irrelevant. It is a whle new statement, which is not substantiated by the original argument.
E. If you truly understand the meaning of E, you would not pick it. Another irrelevant choice.

第一个问题的GAP是可以找出来的还算比较明显,而第二个问题的mindfree大大所说的association,并没有理解,这道题的假设是需要肯定一个目标完成的可能性,这在laywer的assumption方法中该归到哪一种呢?

大大没有解释B,呵呵偶是死缠烂打,我觉得 B似乎也是一个架桥,只不过没有从PREMISE架到CONCLUTION,而是架反了,架反了就是错的

请指教!!

14#
发表于 2006-7-23 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

偶明白了association,真笨. 还请解释B

15#
发表于 2006-9-3 17:32:00 | 只看该作者

Mindfree关于桥梁型假设题解释的真经典!

确实确实。今天做这到题还在想怎么个差异桥梁呢。

16#
发表于 2006-10-16 00:49:00 | 只看该作者
请问在哪儿可以找到Mindfree关于桥梁型假设题解释啊?谢谢指点!
17#
发表于 2006-11-13 15:53:00 | 只看该作者

我的理解:就是说赛车比赛有其对参赛自行车的一定的标准要求,尽管赛车手崇尚革新,但他所要求的革新必须在赛车比赛要求的车型的范围之内,如果超出了这个范围,那么这种革新是无意义的,也就是自行车制造商卖不出去的

18#
发表于 2007-12-17 08:42:00 | 只看该作者

确实GAP很重要啊...但是有的题又好像不是..

努力总结....

19#
发表于 2008-6-13 00:00:00 | 只看该作者
up
20#
发表于 2008-7-2 23:32:00 | 只看该作者
这题读着像conclusion,但是lawyer总结为assumption.请问,到底是哪个?还是那个都能做出来?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 05:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部