ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11727|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP语法(findjuhl整理的126题)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-5 09:57:00 | 只看该作者

PREP语法(findjuhl整理的126题)

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

A. electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still

B. electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still

C. there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being

D. there was less than one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still

E. less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

answer is A

where引导状语从句修饰homes?这样是不是存在一个逻辑上的问题,就是homes有部分(less than one percent of homes)在用电了,而仍然用candles or gas的只是一部分。是否有矛盾?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-5 11:08:00 | 只看该作者

UP

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 12:42:00 | 只看该作者

up again

地板
发表于 2007-6-19 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

同问!!!

这道题想了好半天,还是错了。E为什么不对,where修饰home也说得过去呀?

A. electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still 变成electricity was in homes好像不通吧?

无生命的东西,应该用there be表示存在? 还是用have/has?本来还想选C,但是该死的being.

等待nn!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-19 15:47:29编辑过]
5#
发表于 2007-7-12 13:42:00 | 只看该作者

这题的确麻烦。选A除非原句意思本来就是说, 即使那些1%有electricity的家庭也还是主要依靠gas和candle提供光。。。

我做的时候根据where修饰排除c,e, 根据having light既不能做定语修饰electricity,又不能做伴随状语修饰主句,排除d,在a,b间根据意思排除了a, 认为b选项and后面是平行结构的谓语动词省略,所以省略系动词。

看来句意的把握还是最难的。。。

6#
发表于 2007-7-12 16:12:00 | 只看该作者

E. less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

1. verb tense
2. "where" here modifies electricity (unclear).
 

7#
发表于 2007-7-12 16:52:00 | 只看该作者

“where"decorate "homes",not "less than 1% homes"

8#
发表于 2007-9-16 20:44:00 | 只看该作者

再问:

81.   (28921-!-item-!-188;#058&003760)

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still 《==正确答案

(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still     【与and前的subject不一致? 不恰当地省略了was?】

(C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being 【where修饰 错误,过去进行时时态无使用理由】

(D) there was less than one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still 【was错误,应该根据后面的one percent of 可数名词复数来决定用复数】

(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been【我原来选这个,现在明白了。但不明白前面有人说第一个had的时态也错了。。。好像与前面的had installed 都属于过去时态嘛。。?那为何错了?】

现在已经明白E为何错了,即使没有where的修饰问题,它的had still been 这个过去完成时也完蛋。

但是,我觉得A 。。在下次实战时,类似的问题我可能还是无法选对,所以想问问大家的解题思路。

应该先根据什么排除什么?然后一确定就是A? 请赐教啊!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-16 20:49:20编辑过]
9#
发表于 2007-11-22 08:25:00 | 只看该作者
in less than .... is confusing
10#
发表于 2008-1-5 16:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用vivian_huang在2007-9-16 20:44:00的发言:

再问:

81.   (28921-!-item-!-188;#058&003760)

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still 《==正确答案

(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still     【与and前的subject不一致? 不恰当地省略了was?】

(C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being 【where修饰 错误,过去进行时时态无使用理由】

(D) there was less than one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still 【was错误,应该根据后面的one percent of 可数名词复数来决定用复数】

(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been【我原来选这个,现在明白了。但不明白前面有人说第一个had的时态也错了。。。好像与前面的had installed 都属于过去时态嘛。。?那为何错了?】

现在已经明白E为何错了,即使没有where的修饰问题,它的had still been 这个过去完成时也完蛋。


不明白为什么过去完成式错误

和前面的had installed平行啊

碰上时态的东西就很容易晕啊

麻烦大家指点指点

多谢

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 21:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部