ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 904|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新GWD1--36,37,快考了,急!!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-11-17 22:58:00 | 只看该作者

新GWD1--36,37,快考了,急!!!!

GWD1-Q35 to Q37:

      In corporate purchasing,

       competitive scrutiny is typically

       limited to suppliers of items that are

Line      directly related to end products.

  (5)     With “indirect” purchases (such as

computers, advertising, and legal

services), which are not directly

related to production, corporations

often favor “supplier partnerships”

 (10)     (arrangements in which the

purchaser forgoes the right to

pursue alternative suppliers), which

can inappropriately shelter suppliers

from rigorous competitive scrutiny

 (15)     that might afford the purchaser

economic leverage.  There are two

independent variables—availability

of alternatives and ease of changing

suppliers—that companies should

 (20)     use to evaluate the feasibility of

       subjecting suppliers of indirect

       purchases to competitive scrutiny.

This can create four possible

situations.

 (25)           In Type 1 situations, there are

many alternatives and change is

relatively easy.  Open pursuit of

alternatives—by frequent com-

petitive bidding, if possible—will

 (30)     likely yield the best results.  In

Type 2 situations, where there

are many alternatives but change

       is difficult—as for providers of

employee health-care benefits—it

 (35)
                  is important to continuously test

the market and use the results to

secure concessions from existing

suppliers.  Alternatives provide a

      credible threat to suppliers, even if

 (40)    the ability to switch is constrained.

In Type 3 situations, there are few

alternatives, but the ability to switch

without difficulty creates a threat that

companies can use to negotiate

 (45)     concessions from existing suppliers.

In Type 4 situations, where there

are few alternatives and change

is difficult, partnerships may be

unavoidable.

GWD1-Q36:

Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

             

  1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.

  2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

  3. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.

  4. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.

  5. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

GWD1-Q37:

According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?

 

  1. The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny

  2. The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company

  3. The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company

  4. The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product

  5. The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations

答案为B,E。

请牛人帮我分析一下,文章在讲什么,为什么选这两个,谢谢!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-9 02:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部