[求助]GDW-1-Q17

christlulu

Editorial:

 

 

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.  Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient.  A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce.  The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted.  This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

 

 

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

 

1. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.
2. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
3. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
4. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
5. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.

为什么选B  

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-23 11:01:13编辑过]

hizzzzz

我选的A啊，看不懂！
有没哪位大牛指点一下？

christlulu

怎么都没人回答这道题呢？

 

FlowerJay

BF的题无非是要看出三点：1.论据；2.论点；3.转折。 细分的话，就是主论点，主论据；副论点，副论据；反对论点，和作者态度；楼主把每一道的BF的题都这么分析一遍，BF应该是送分给你的

gonghao

The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted.  This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

A is definetely wrong since " expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required ".That was not the point of view from editorial.On the other hand ,editorial says that "This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, ".It was a judgement by editorial concering about the proposal raised by expert.