[讨论]☆有关环境保护的论点和论据（2篇）

excellent

[讨论]有关环境保护的论点和论据
2、“it is unrealistic to expect individual nations to make, independently, the sacrifices necessary to conserve energy. international leadership and worldwide cooperation are essential if we expect to protect the world’s energy resources for future generations.”
“指望单个国家独立地做出必要的牺牲来保存能源是不现实的。如果我们希望为下一代保护世界的能源资源，国际领导力量和全球性的公司是基本的。”

13、“responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to government.”
“保护自然环境的责任完全属于每个个人，而非政府。”

这两个题目被我在《[推荐]★GMAT作文常考题目总结★》 设为第三类：建筑估价（2篇），有的同志认为题目较难，那就让我们先来讨论讨论。

请大家以这样的格式来书写：
1、论点：
2、论据：

谢谢大家的参与！

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-19 7:20:53编辑过]

excellent

孙远《gmat写作》中的论点和论据如下：

2、
Position: Emphasis on the overwhelming importance of international leadership and worldwide cooperation for the purpose of energy conversation does not necessarily contradict with encouraging individual nations to make voluntary and independent efforts to protect energy resources.

A: Left to their own devices, individual nations, like people, will act according to their own short-term motives and self-interest.

B: The problem of energy crisis as well as the solution to it is international in scope.

C: However, when individual nations become aware of the importance of the preservation of their domestic energy resources as well as the interdependence of nations in term of energy consumption and conservation, they are very likely to make consicous sacrifices for the good of their own national interests.

13、
Position: Although individuals' voluntary actions are necessary for environmental preservation, I insist that governmental participation plays a more important role in this campaign.

A: Individual or private companies tend to pursue their short-term private interests, which has been the direct cause of environmental crisis.

B: Government possesses the authority and resources necessary to address environmental problems.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-19 8:06:46编辑过]

excellent

我个人拙见

2.
论点：指望单个国家独立地做出必要的牺牲来保存能源资源很不现实，国际力量不可缺少。
论据：世界上各个国家的能源资源占用储备竞争非常激烈，这最终决定着单个国家综合实力在世界上的排名。牺牲自己国家的利益来保护能源资源将不利于竞争，因此要单个国家做出牺牲保护资源是不太可能的。另外，保护世界能源资源象对待其他世界问题一样必须靠全部国家的共同努力，国际领导力量和全球公司的努力是不可或缺的。

13.
论点：保护自然环境的责任既属于个人，也属于政府。
论据：每个个人都有保护自然资源的责任。我们要努力保护我们的生存环境，为了后代的健康，也为了社会的可持续发展，每个个人保护环境的力量都是不可忽视的。但是，保护自然资源需要有组织地、有计划地进行，个人对环境的保护非常有限，这就需要政府进行合理的安排和调度，使得环境保护工作更加的有效。

写的不好，欢迎大家批评。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-19 9:25:07编辑过]

anchoret

up.

大家有什么好的看法？

老螃蟹

论点：保护自然环境的责任既属于个人，也属于政府。
论据：自然环境是人类的生存环境，环境问题最终会导致人类的生存环境恶化，对人类的生存形成威胁。所以保护自然环境的责任和我们每个人相关。但是单凭个人的力量，很难将环保的概念普及，环保的科研也需要合作的力量，同时大规模的环保项目也需要大规模资金的投入。政府在此过程中也起到了组织、研发和投资的作用。

vidy

2
论点：赞同
补充一些论据:
Developing countries are home to many of the world's most species-rich ecosystems and  thus forming abundant energy sources. Yet these countries are often poor and heavily populated. Creating a system of conservation that works in these areas poses a tremendous challenge to scientists, local communities and the international community.

Much evidence show that even some large preserves in developing countries have failed to prevent energy resources loss.For example, Twenty years ago, Indonesia created an integrated forest management system based on principles of conservation biology. Unfortunately, mismanagement, and economic and political turmoil have gradually eroded these principles. As a result, forest management in Indonesia is now in a state of chaos and the situation is dire. A group of researchers wrote in a recent edition of the journal Science: "If the current state of resource anarchy continues, the lowland forests of the Sundra Shelf, the richest forests on Earth, will be destroyed by 2005 on Sumatra and 2010 on Kalimantan."

Clearly, a more integrated and better-funded system of conservation in developing nations is required. Unless the proper management tools are in place, "protection" on paper will mean nothing at all in the real world. Developing nations do not have the resources to accomplish this on their own. Since all people stand to lose if the rich energy resource capital of the tropics is eroded, undoubtedly this is an international problem.

excellent

顶！

enhance

希望XDJM指导Issue 42, 谢谢!

42．“scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.”
discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

casamila

补充一些论据:

Climate change is a global problem requiring action from the entire international community. Countries from around the world are working together to share technologies, experience, resources and talent to lower net greenhouse gas emissions and reduce the threat of global climate change. The United States participates in and supports several international efforts designed to help countries to address climate change.

One important strategy for reducing global greenhouse gas emissions is developing and sharing climate-friendly technologies, commonly referred to as Technology Cooperation. These efforts can occur between nations, private entities, and organizations around the world.

excellent

up!